LITvsICLNETF Comparison
VS
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.39% for ICLN. LIT is up 5.29% year-to-date (YTD) with -$60M in YTD flows. ICLN performs better with 8.82% YTD performance, and +$377M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT ICLN | -13.70%-13.08% | -17.91%-10.70% | +5.29%+8.82% | +53.70%+29.32% | +8.01%-0.54% | -11.66%-15.11% |
| Flows | LIT ICLN | -$66M-$260M | -$110M+$276M | -$60M+$377M | -$59M+$515M | -$1.37B-$1.04B | -$1.12B-$1.73B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT ICLN | +29.75%+37.00% | +28.50%+28.31% | +26.41%+24.37% | +26.28%+26.38% |
| Max drawdown | LIT ICLN | -25.43%-24.63% | -25.43%-24.63% | -49.84%-41.79% | -64.51%-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT ICLN | 74d52d | 74d52d | 875d911d | 1705d1726d |
Trading data
LIT | ICLN | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.81 | $17.78 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $69.02 | $18.37 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.81 | $17.78 |
| 1D performance | -1.75% | -3.21% |
| AuM | $1.49 B | $2.35 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.39% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
ICLN
USA
45.59%
China
18.15%
Other
36.26%
Sectors
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
ICLN
Industrials
56.7%
Utilities
33.46%
Technology
7.95%
Other
1.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
ICLN
Bloom Energy Corp.
14.75%
First Solar, Inc.
8.41%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.32%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
5.78%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.87%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.11%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.85%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.65%
Equatorial SA
2.56%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.52%
EDP SA
2.25%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.22%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.60%
Ørsted A/S
1.55%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
1.46%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and ICLN
How have the LIT and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, LIT is up 5.29% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 8.82%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw -$60M in flows, compared to +$377M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or ICLN?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 28.5%, while ICLN experienced 28.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or ICLN?
As of July 24, 2026, LIT holds $1.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.35 B.
What sectors do the LIT and ICLN ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and ICLN ETF?
LIT top holdings include Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp.. ICLN holds in its top three: Bloom Energy Corp., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or ICLN?
LIT holds 36 securities with 78.8% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 104 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.9%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & ICLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
ICLN
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
Advertisement
