Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KWEBvsMINVETF Comparison
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) belong to the same industry segment: EM Awakening. KWEB's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Real Estate. In contrast, MINV's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Energy. KWEB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.79% for MINV. KWEB is down -10.86% year-to-date (YTD) with -$342M in YTD flows. MINV performs better with 11.98% YTD performance, and +$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KWEB and MINV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KWEB vs MINV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KWEB MINV | -10.94%+1.96% | -12.05%+13.52% | -10.86%+11.98% | -10.94%+41.67% | +17.87%+71.03% | -57.58%n/a |
| Flows | KWEB MINV | -$308M+$17M | -$653M+$28M | -$342M+$24M | -$183M+$27M | +$1.58B-$53M | +$10.21B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KWEB MINV | +22.41%+27.30% | +26.62%+21.16% | +30.42%+17.88% | +40.92%n/a |
| Max drawdown | KWEB MINV | -20.69%-10.82% | -27.56%-15.16% | -27.56%-16.66% | -76.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | KWEB MINV | 56d13d | 160d56d | 160d101d | 1826dn/a |
KWEB | MINV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.16 | $38.63 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $30.06 | $38.39 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KWEB | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KWEB | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.16 | $38.63 |
| 1D performance | +0.33% | +0.64% |
| AuM | $6.75 B | $112.88 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.79% |
KWEB | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | KraneShares | Matthews Asia |
| Benchmark | CSI Overseas China Internet Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2013 | July 13, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KWEB and MINV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, KWEB is down -10.86% year-to-date (YTD), while MINV has returned 11.98%. That puts MINV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KWEB or MINV?
Year-to-date, the KWEB ETF saw -$342M in flows, compared to +$24M for MINV.
Which ETF is more volatile: KWEB or MINV?
Over the past year, KWEB had a volatility of 26.62%, while MINV experienced 21.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: KWEB or MINV?
As of March 11, 2026, KWEB holds $6.75 B in assets under management (AUM), while MINV manages $112.88 M.
What sectors do the KWEB and MINV ETFs invest in?
KWEB leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, MINV focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the KWEB ETF and MINV ETF?
KWEB top holdings include ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD, TENCENT HOLDINGS and PINDUODUO INC ADR. MINV holds in its top three: JEREH OILFIELD, WUXI BIOLOGICS (CAYMAN) and WIN SEMI.
Which ETF is more diversified: KWEB or MINV?
KWEB holds 29 securities with 78.21% of its assets in the top 15. MINV has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.03%.
U.S. ETFs Arrive on ADX, Connecting Abu Dhabi and New York Markets
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
Growth Potential of China ETFs
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
