KLIPvsDIVOETF Comparison
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. KLIP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.94%, versus 0.56% for DIVO. KLIP is down -14.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$715K in YTD flows. DIVO performs better with 11.6% YTD performance, and +$1.77B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KLIP and DIVO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KLIP vs DIVO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KLIP DIVO | -2.85%+2.23% | -6.95%+3.02% | -14.46%+11.60% | -18.33%+12.73% | +10.98%+64.48% | n/a+67.03% |
| Flows | KLIP DIVO | -$5M+$102M | -$5M+$369M | +$715K+$1.77B | +$12M+$2.20B | +$83M+$3.78B | -+$6.00B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KLIP DIVO | +13.14%+8.32% | +15.72%+9.33% | +17.01%+10.58% | n/a+11.80% |
| Max drawdown | KLIP DIVO | -8.97%-4.23% | -21.36%-5.92% | -21.36%-12.14% | n/a-13.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | KLIP DIVO | 78d55d | 271d114d | 271d130d | n/a329d |
KLIP | DIVO | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.62 | $47.64 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $21.13 | $47.95 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
KLIP | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.62 | $47.64 |
| 1D performance | -2.41% | -0.65% |
| AuM | $84.06 M | $8.07 B |
| E/R | 0.94% | 0.56% |
KLIP | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | KraneShares | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 12, 2023 | December 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
