Explore professionally built ETF model portfolios. Discover now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

JPOvsQYLDETF Comparison

ETF 1
JPO

YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF

This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+0.22%
VS
ETF 2
QYLD

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF

This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+0.22%

YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. JPO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.04%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. JPO is up 4.76% year-to-date (YTD) with -$19M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 15.99% YTD performance, and -$162M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of JPO and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

JPO vs QYLD performance and flow charts

Performance

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Sep 15Sep 22Sep 29Oct 6Oct 13

Cumulative Flows

-20 M0 M20 M40 M60 M80 MSep 15Sep 22Sep 29Oct 6Oct 13

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
JPO
QYLD
-3.45%+3.58%
-1.90%+5.38%
+4.76%+15.99%
+7.38%+23.10%
+51.41%+56.16%
n/a+53.15%
Flows
JPO
QYLD
-$17M+$46M
-$6M+$71M
-$19M-$162M
-$23M-$291M
+$44M+$89M
-+$4.87B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
JPO
QYLD
+14.18%+9.40%
+18.62%+10.94%
+18.12%+13.46%
n/a+15.24%
Max drawdown
JPO
QYLD
-8.01%-5.08%
-14.04%-5.84%
-23.61%-19.06%
n/a-24.74%
Max drawdown duration
JPO
QYLD
64d22d
177d39d
134d239d
n/a771d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
JPO
QYLD
Last sale
10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
$18.32
Previous close
10/15/2026
$18.74
Consolidated volume
10/15/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

JPO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
JPO
QYLD
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
JPO
QYLD
Last price
–
$18.32
1D performance
–
-2.24%
AuM$29.93 M$8.56 B
E/R1.04%0.6%
Characteristics
JPO
QYLD
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderYieldMax ETFsGlobal X
Benchmark-CBOE Nasdaq 100 BuyWrite V2 Index
N° of holdings--
Asset class-Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateSeptember 11, 2023December 11, 2013
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

JPO
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon

Sectors

JPO
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement

Diversification

JPO
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 1, 1970
JPO
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about JPO and QYLD

How have the JPO and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 15, 2026, JPO is up 4.76% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 15.99%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: JPO or QYLD?

Year-to-date, the JPO ETF saw -$19M in flows, compared to -$162M for QYLD.

Which ETF is more volatile: JPO or QYLD?

Over the past year, JPO had a volatility of 18.62%, while QYLD experienced 10.94%.

Which ETF is bigger: JPO or QYLD?

As of October 15, 2026, JPO holds $29.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.56 B.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

With 1,790 new products launched by July 2026, choosing is harder than ever. Our Global ETF Survey 2026, built on 620 professional investors and allocators, shows how active, fixed income, options-based and thematic ETFs are reshaping fund selection.

Global ETF Survey 2026