IWMWvsRYLDETF Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWMW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.6% for RYLD. IWMW is up 4.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. RYLD performs worse with 4.03% YTD performance, and +$34M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMW and RYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMW vs RYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMW RYLD | +6.61%+5.48% | +2.01%+1.08% | +4.88%+4.03% | +23.62%+19.06% | n/a+22.11% | n/a+9.82% |
| Flows | IWMW RYLD | +$2M+$7M | +$7M+$17M | +$15M+$34M | +$28M-$49M | -+$141M | -+$1.84B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMW RYLD | +15.68%+14.05% | +12.28%+11.07% | n/a+13.35% | n/a+14.52% |
| Max drawdown | IWMW RYLD | -6.92%-6.31% | -6.92%-6.31% | n/a-18.87% | n/a-21.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMW RYLD | 60d61d | 60d61d | n/a243d | n/a1509d |
IWMW | RYLD | |
Last sale 4/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.09 | $15.26 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $38.21 | $15.32 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWMW | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWMW | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.09 | $15.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.39% |
| AuM | $49.12 M | $1.31 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.6% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
