Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWFvsSCHGETF Comparison
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. IWF's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, SCHG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. IWF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.04% for SCHG. IWF is down -4.6% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3.40B in YTD flows. SCHG performs worse with -5.54% YTD performance, and +$808M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWF and SCHG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWF vs SCHG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWF SCHG | -1.42%-1.07% | -5.65%-6.73% | -4.60%-5.54% | +24.77%+23.18% | +103.62%+109.76% | +92.00%+93.87% |
| Flows | IWF SCHG | +$648M+$197M | -$2.01B+$1.25B | -$3.40B+$808M | -$1.57B+$7.39B | -$469M+$16.59B | -$1.22B+$19.73B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWF SCHG | +15.76%+15.30% | +22.60%+23.06% | +19.04%+19.55% | +21.41%+22.46% |
| Max drawdown | IWF SCHG | -7.14%-8.06% | -15.75%-15.72% | -23.36%-23.41% | -32.75%-34.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWF SCHG | 76d76d | 45d45d | 191d193d | 743d754d |
IWF | SCHG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 3:26 PM | $444.72 | $30.35 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $451.32 | $30.80 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $444.72 | $30.35 |
| 1D performance | -1.46% | -1.46% |
| AuM | $116.99 B | $50.74 B |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.04% |
IWF | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Growth Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 349 | 169 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 22, 2000 | December 11, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWF and SCHG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IWF is down -4.6% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHG has lost -5.54%. That puts IWF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWF or SCHG?
Year-to-date, the IWF ETF saw -$3.40B in flows, compared to +$808M for SCHG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWF or SCHG?
Over the past year, IWF had a volatility of 22.6%, while SCHG experienced 23.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWF or SCHG?
As of March 11, 2026, IWF holds $116.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while SCHG manages $50.74 B.
What sectors do the IWF and SCHG ETFs invest in?
IWF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, SCHG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWF ETF and SCHG ETF?
IWF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. SCHG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWF or SCHG?
IWF holds 391 securities with 66.22% of its assets in the top 15. SCHG has 189 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.64%.
ETF Comparison: Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Versus Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV)
Top 3 growth ETFs of 2022
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
