Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IVWvsSCHGETF Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. IVW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.04% for SCHG. IVW is down -4.31% year-to-date (YTD) with -$363M in YTD flows. SCHG performs worse with -7.25% YTD performance, and +$820M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IVW and SCHG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IVW vs SCHG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IVW SCHG | -1.32%-0.87% | -3.54%-6.95% | -4.31%-7.25% | +25.67%+19.36% | +101.93%+105.98% | +90.18%+91.60% |
| Flows | IVW SCHG | +$149M+$180M | -$440M+$1.23B | -$363M+$820M | -$1.30B+$7.41B | +$5.51B+$16.60B | +$4.55B+$19.78B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IVW SCHG | +16.44%+15.40% | +22.36%+23.11% | +18.65%+19.57% | +21.12%+22.47% |
| Max drawdown | IVW SCHG | -6.13%-8.63% | -15.10%-15.72% | -22.23%-23.41% | -32.78%-34.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | IVW SCHG | 43d77d | 45d45d | 124d193d | 794d754d |
IVW | SCHG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $117.89 | $30.24 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $119.93 | $30.80 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IVW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IVW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $117.89 | $30.24 |
| 1D performance | -1.70% | -1.82% |
| AuM | $63.35 B | $49.83 B |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.04% |
IVW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Growth Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 132 | 169 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 22, 2000 | December 11, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IVW and SCHG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IVW is down -4.31% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHG has lost -7.25%. That puts IVW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IVW or SCHG?
Year-to-date, the IVW ETF saw -$363M in flows, compared to +$820M for SCHG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IVW or SCHG?
Over the past year, IVW had a volatility of 22.36%, while SCHG experienced 23.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: IVW or SCHG?
As of March 12, 2026, IVW holds $63.35 B in assets under management (AUM), while SCHG manages $49.83 B.
What sectors do the IVW and SCHG ETFs invest in?
IVW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SCHG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IVW ETF and SCHG ETF?
IVW top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. SCHG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IVW or SCHG?
IVW holds 140 securities with 69.25% of its assets in the top 15. SCHG has 189 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.64%.
ETF Comparison: Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Versus Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV)
How to become a growth investor using ETFs
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.