IVVBvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. IVVB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.53%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. IVVB is up 7.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 14.01% YTD performance, and -$142M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IVVB and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IVVB vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IVVB QYLD | +0.04%-0.61% | +3.10%+6.92% | +7.16%+14.01% | +7.72%+17.99% | +51.59%+61.10% | n/a+48.91% |
| Flows | IVVB QYLD | +$10M-$12M | +$11M+$9M | +$2M-$142M | +$10M-$159M | +$89M+$109M | -+$4.80B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IVVB QYLD | +7.90%+9.98% | +7.77%+11.32% | +9.12%+13.49% | n/a+15.30% |
| Max drawdown | IVVB QYLD | -1.87%-2.63% | -5.73%-5.84% | -12.81%-19.06% | n/a-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | IVVB QYLD | 36d11d | 73d39d | 153d239d | n/a771d |
Trading data
IVVB | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.66 | $18.37 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $35.50 | $18.24 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IVVB
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIVVB | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IVVB | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.66 | $18.37 |
| 1D performance | +0.45% | +0.71% |
| AuM | $140.51 M | $8.36 B |
| E/R | 0.53% | 0.6% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IVVB
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
IVVB
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
IVVB
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
IVVB
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about IVVB and QYLD
How have the IVVB and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, IVVB is up 7.16% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 14.01%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IVVB or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the IVVB ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$142M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: IVVB or QYLD?
Over the past year, IVVB had a volatility of 7.77%, while QYLD experienced 11.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: IVVB or QYLD?
As of October 26, 2026, IVVB holds $140.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.36 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about IVVB & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
