Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IQSIvsDBEFETF Comparison
NYLI Candriam International Equity ETF (IQSI) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. IQSI's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, DBEF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. IQSI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%, versus 0.35% for DBEF. IQSI is up 3.11% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. DBEF performs better with 3.49% YTD performance, and -$63M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IQSI and DBEF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IQSI vs DBEF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IQSI DBEF | -5.31%-3.13% | +4.37%+5.22% | +3.11%+3.49% | +22.47%+22.76% | +54.20%+65.25% | +47.38%+85.75% |
| Flows | IQSI DBEF | --$31M | --$298M | --$63M | -$34M-$377M | -$36M+$2.19B | +$14M+$2.45B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IQSI DBEF | +14.43%+11.64% | +16.13%+13.71% | +13.80%+11.43% | +14.91%+11.76% |
| Max drawdown | IQSI DBEF | -8.39%-6.85% | -13.60%-14.30% | -15.07%-14.53% | -29.34%-14.56% |
| Max drawdown duration | IQSI DBEF | 10d10d | 38d56d | 214d73d | 892d385d |
IQSI | DBEF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.46 | $49.18 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.86 | $49.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IQSI | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IQSI | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.46 | $49.18 |
| 1D performance | -1.12% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $221.65 M | $8.40 B |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.35% |
IQSI | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | New York Life Investments | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | NYLI Candriam International Equity Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 580 | 657 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 17, 2019 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IQSI and DBEF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IQSI is up 3.11% year-to-date (YTD), while DBEF has returned 3.49%. That puts DBEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IQSI or DBEF?
Year-to-date, the IQSI ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$63M for DBEF.
Which ETF is more volatile: IQSI or DBEF?
Over the past year, IQSI had a volatility of 16.13%, while DBEF experienced 13.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: IQSI or DBEF?
As of March 11, 2026, IQSI holds $221.65 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBEF manages $8.40 B.
What sectors do the IQSI and DBEF ETFs invest in?
IQSI leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, DBEF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IQSI ETF and DBEF ETF?
IQSI top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and NOVARTIS. DBEF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IQSI or DBEF?
IQSI holds 608 securities with 24.41% of its assets in the top 15. DBEF has 697 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.46%.
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
