New

ETF model portfolios designed for real investor needs. Discover →

Advertisement
Advertisement

IONvsTANETF Comparison

ETF 1
ION

ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF

This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-1.68%
VS
ETF 2
TAN

Invesco Solar ETF

This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-1.68%

ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ION's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, TAN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. ION is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.7% for TAN. ION is down -2.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. TAN performs worse with -4.11% YTD performance, and +$125M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ION and TAN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

ION vs TAN performance and flow charts

Performance

-10.0-5.00.05.0%Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9

Cumulative Flows

-200 M-150 M-100 M-50 M0 MAug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
ION
TAN
-3.21%-9.11%
-8.68%-20.75%
-2.61%-4.11%
+44.05%+12.37%
+55.83%-14.84%
n/a-43.54%
Flows
ION
TAN
--$200M
-$1M-$482M
+$5M+$125M
+$10M+$263M
+$10M-$73M
--$568M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
ION
TAN
+32.46%+36.46%
+34.55%+34.86%
+28.02%+36.27%
n/a+36.27%
Max drawdown
ION
TAN
-23.84%-25.39%
-32.54%-36.40%
-34.77%-53.60%
n/a-73.61%
Max drawdown duration
ION
TAN
88d88d
127d102d
673d866d
n/a1774d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
ION
TAN
Last sale
9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
$50.11
$47.15
Previous close
09/10/2026
$50.83
$47.04
Consolidated volume
09/10/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
ION
TAN
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ION
TAN
Last price
$50.11
$47.15
1D performance
-1.42%
+0.23%
AuM$12.60 M$1.00 B
E/R0.58%0.7%
Characteristics
ION
TAN
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderProSharesInvesco
BenchmarkS&P Global Core Battery Metals IndexMAC Global Solar Energy Stock Index
N° of holdings5135
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateNovember 29, 2022April 15, 2008
ESGYesYes
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

ION
China
33.9%
Australia
16.68%
Indonesia
8.67%
South Africa
8.49%
Other
32.27%
TAN
USA
44.51%
Israel
22.15%
China
8.15%
Other
25.19%

Sectors

ION
Non-Energy Materi.
86.96%
Other
13.04%
TAN
Industrials
44.91%
Utilities
34.17%
Technology
10.53%
Other
10.38%
Advertisement

Diversification

ION

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

46.3%
TAN

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

73.02%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
ION
Pacific Metals Co., Ltd.
4.27%
IGO Ltd.
3.81%
PT Vale Indonesia Tbk
3.70%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
3.19%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.13%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
3.11%
Liontown Ltd.
3.09%
Tibet Mineral Development Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Zangge Mining Co., Ltd.
2.94%
Albemarle Corp.
2.80%
Qinghai Salt Lake Industry Co., Ltd.
2.74%
Eramet SA
2.73%
African Rainbow Minerals Ltd.
2.71%
Mineral Resources Ltd.
2.57%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
2.54%
TAN
Nextpower, Inc.
9.93%
First Solar, Inc.
9.73%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
7.54%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
6.29%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd.
4.59%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
4.39%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
4.24%
Sunrun, Inc.
4.18%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
3.54%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
3.50%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
3.37%
Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente SA
3.16%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.
2.95%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
2.90%
SMA Solar Technology AG
2.69%
Frequently asked questions about ION and TAN

How have the ION and TAN ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 11, 2026, ION is down -2.61% year-to-date (YTD), while TAN has lost -4.11%. That puts ION better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ION or TAN?

Year-to-date, the ION ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$125M for TAN.

Which ETF is more volatile: ION or TAN?

Over the past year, ION had a volatility of 34.55%, while TAN experienced 34.86%.

Which ETF is bigger: ION or TAN?

As of September 11, 2026, ION holds $12.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while TAN manages $1.00 B.

What sectors do the ION and TAN ETFs invest in?

ION leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, TAN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.

What are the top holdings of the ION ETF and TAN ETF?

ION top holdings include Pacific Metals Co., Ltd., IGO Ltd. and PT Vale Indonesia Tbk. TAN holds in its top three: Nextpower, Inc., First Solar, Inc. and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd..

Which ETF is more diversified: ION or TAN?

ION holds 51 securities with 46.3% of its assets in the top 15. TAN has 35 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.02%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up