IOCTvsHELOETF Comparison
ETF 1
IOCT
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - October
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.98%
VS
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - October (IOCT) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. IOCT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.5% for HELO. IOCT is up 8.39% year-to-date (YTD) with -$21M in YTD flows. HELO performs worse with 4.62% YTD performance, and +$1.07B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IOCT and HELO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IOCT vs HELO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IOCT HELO | -0.20%+1.14% | +1.81%+1.63% | +8.39%+4.62% | +10.40%+7.59% | +44.24%+39.50% | +49.58%n/a |
| Flows | IOCT HELO | +$24M+$78M | +$25M+$618M | -$21M+$1.07B | -$9M+$1.14B | +$24M+$4.25B | +$118M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IOCT HELO | +6.74%+7.26% | +8.52%+7.02% | +9.40%+7.84% | +10.23%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IOCT HELO | -2.08%-2.37% | -6.39%-5.83% | -7.01%-10.86% | -16.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IOCT HELO | 24d61d | 68d73d | 39d169d | 535dn/a |
Trading data
IOCT | HELO | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.60 | $69.44 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $37.74 | $69.21 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IOCT | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.60 | $69.44 |
| 1D performance | -0.37% | +0.33% |
| AuM | $193.64 M | $4.86 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
IOCT | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 1, 2021 | September 28, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IOCT
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Sectors
IOCT
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
IOCT
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
IOCT
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about IOCT and HELO
How have the IOCT and HELO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IOCT is up 8.39% year-to-date (YTD), while HELO has returned 4.62%. That puts IOCT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IOCT or HELO?
Year-to-date, the IOCT ETF saw -$21M in flows, compared to +$1.07B for HELO.
Which ETF is more volatile: IOCT or HELO?
Over the past year, IOCT had a volatility of 8.52%, while HELO experienced 7.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: IOCT or HELO?
As of October 16, 2026, IOCT holds $193.64 M in assets under management (AUM), while HELO manages $4.86 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about IOCT & HELO
Hedged Equity ETFs: Options-Based Alternatives to the 60/40 Portfolio
March 25, 2025
HELO
Advertisement
Advertisement
