Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IGFvsMLPAETF Comparison
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. IGF's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, MLPA's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities IGF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.45% for MLPA. IGF is up 8.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$290M in YTD flows. MLPA performs better with 13.52% YTD performance, and +$73M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IGF and MLPA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IGF vs MLPA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IGF MLPA | -0.90%+3.39% | +9.32%+12.66% | +8.74%+13.52% | +30.82%+12.43% | +59.33%+62.55% | +73.10%+130.24% |
| Flows | IGF MLPA | +$177M+$16M | +$443M+$115M | +$290M+$73M | +$2.40B+$244M | +$3.99B+$374M | +$4.62B+$682M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IGF MLPA | +9.83%+10.97% | +11.89%+15.79% | +11.90%+13.85% | +13.21%+18.44% |
| Max drawdown | IGF MLPA | -3.66%-1.74% | -8.54%-14.09% | -14.82%-14.09% | -20.74%-18.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | IGF MLPA | 10d5d | 14d299d | 321d299d | 747d77d |
IGF | MLPA | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 6:32 PM | $66.84 | $53.82 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $66.83 | $53.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IGF | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IGF | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.84 | $53.82 |
| 1D performance | +0.01% | -0.16% |
| AuM | $10.00 B | $2.14 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.45% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IGF and MLPA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IGF is up 8.74% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPA has returned 13.52%. That puts MLPA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IGF or MLPA?
Year-to-date, the IGF ETF saw +$290M in flows, compared to +$73M for MLPA.
Which ETF is more volatile: IGF or MLPA?
Over the past year, IGF had a volatility of 11.89%, while MLPA experienced 15.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: IGF or MLPA?
As of March 11, 2026, IGF holds $10.00 B in assets under management (AUM), while MLPA manages $2.14 B.
What sectors do the IGF and MLPA ETFs invest in?
IGF leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, MLPA focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the IGF ETF and MLPA ETF?
IGF top holdings include NEXTERA ENERGY, ES0105046017 and TRANSURBAN GRP REIT. MLPA holds in its top three: ENERGY TRANSFER LP UNITS, ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS UNT and MPLX COMMON UNITS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IGF or MLPA?
IGF holds 78 securities with 50.22% of its assets in the top 15. MLPA has 20 securities and a top 15 weight of 107.18%.
Three Ways You Can Get Higher Income with ETFs
Resilience in Energy Infrastructure Funds Amidst Last Week’s Market Decline
Moving Beyond the 60/40 Convention
Moving Beyond the 60/40 Convention
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
