Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IFLRvsDBEFETF Comparison
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF
Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. IFLR's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, DBEF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. IFLR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.35% for DBEF. IFLR is up 2.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$42M in YTD flows. DBEF performs better with 3.61% YTD performance, and -$63M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IFLR and DBEF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IFLR vs DBEF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IFLR DBEF | -3.43%-2.75% | +4.77%+5.53% | +2.35%+3.61% | n/a+21.29% | n/a+62.20% | n/a+86.74% |
| Flows | IFLR DBEF | +$21M-$52M | +$42M-$298M | +$42M-$63M | --$377M | -+$2.19B | -+$2.45B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IFLR DBEF | +12.80%+11.63% | n/a+13.78% | n/a+11.49% | n/a+11.76% |
| Max drawdown | IFLR DBEF | -7.34%-6.85% | n/a-14.30% | n/a-14.53% | n/a-14.56% |
| Max drawdown duration | IFLR DBEF | 9d9d | n/a56d | n/a73d | n/a385d |
IFLR | DBEF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.31 | $49.91 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $51.49 | $49.89 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IFLR | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IFLR | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.31 | $49.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $51.57 M | $8.41 B |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.35% |
IFLR | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Innovator | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 281 | 657 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 19, 2025 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IFLR and DBEF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, IFLR is up 2.35% year-to-date (YTD), while DBEF has returned 3.61%. That puts DBEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IFLR or DBEF?
Year-to-date, the IFLR ETF saw +$42M in flows, compared to -$63M for DBEF.
Which ETF is bigger: IFLR or DBEF?
As of March 10, 2026, IFLR holds $51.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBEF manages $8.41 B.
What sectors do the IFLR and DBEF ETFs invest in?
IFLR leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, DBEF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IFLR ETF and DBEF ETF?
IFLR top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS. DBEF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IFLR or DBEF?
IFLR holds 296 securities with 18.53% of its assets in the top 15. DBEF has 697 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.46%.
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
