IDVOvsGPIXETF Comparison
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. IDVO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.35% for GPIX. IDVO is up 12.13% year-to-date (YTD) with +$776M in YTD flows. GPIX performs better with 13.06% YTD performance, and +$3.36B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IDVO and GPIX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IDVO vs GPIX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IDVO GPIX | -1.92%+1.72% | -1.24%+2.41% | +12.13%+13.06% | +17.28%+17.41% | +80.86%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | IDVO GPIX | +$26M+$469M | +$142M+$1.40B | +$776M+$3.36B | +$918M+$4.11B | +$1.27B- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IDVO GPIX | +13.35%+9.12% | +16.60%+11.06% | +15.75%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IDVO GPIX | -5.03%-2.24% | -10.29%-7.71% | -15.66%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IDVO GPIX | 38d15d | 69d47d | 54dn/a | n/an/a |
IDVO | GPIX | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.04 | $55.60 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $41.04 | $56.10 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
IDVO | GPIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.04 | $55.60 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.89% |
| AuM | $1.42 B | $6.22 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.35% |
IDVO | GPIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Amplify ETFs | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 8, 2022 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
