ICOPvsRINGETF Comparison
VS
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. ICOP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, RING's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials and Non-Corporate. ICOP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.39% for RING. ICOP is up 28.08% year-to-date (YTD) with +$253M in YTD flows. RING performs worse with 16.59% YTD performance, and -$650M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICOP and RING below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICOP vs RING performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICOP RING | -5.21%-6.09% | +5.96%+21.73% | +28.08%+16.59% | +64.48%+37.11% | +150.69%+296.52% | n/a+270.30% |
| Flows | ICOP RING | +$12M+$159M | +$8M-$248M | +$253M-$650M | +$316M-$388M | +$383M+$232M | -+$207M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICOP RING | +38.45%+46.84% | +39.49%+49.12% | +33.37%+38.42% | n/a+36.20% |
| Max drawdown | ICOP RING | -12.61%-13.59% | -25.36%-38.27% | -37.39%-38.27% | n/a-47.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICOP RING | 28d43d | 96d205d | 478d205d | n/a819d |
Trading data
ICOP | RING | |
Last sale 9/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.69 | $81.91 |
| Previous close 09/22/2026 | $56.44 | $85.84 |
| Consolidated volume 09/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICOP | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICOP | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.69 | $81.91 |
| 1D performance | -3.11% | -4.58% |
| AuM | $496.16 M | $2.59 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
ICOP | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index | MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners IMI Index |
| N° of holdings | 45 | 41 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2023 | January 31, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICOP
Canada
26.72%
United Kingdom
17.8%
Australia
16.98%
USA
15.84%
Mexico
8.45%
Other
14.2%
RING
Canada
54.64%
USA
26.02%
South Africa
7.13%
Other
12.21%
Sectors
ICOP
Non-Energy Materi.
96.23%
Other
3.77%
RING
Non-Energy Materi.
99.87%
Other
0.13%
Advertisement
Diversification
ICOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.99%
RING
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.97%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ICOP
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
8.45%
Anglo American Plc
8.08%
BHP Group Ltd.
7.98%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
7.83%
Teck Resources Limited
5.53%
Rio Tinto Plc
5.17%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.67%
Evolution Mining Ltd.
4.62%
Antofagasta Plc
4.46%
Lundin Mining Corp.
4.45%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
4.25%
Barrick Mining Corp.
3.51%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
3.39%
Newmont Corp.
3.31%
Vale SA
3.29%
RING
Newmont Corp.
16.67%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
12.15%
Barrick Mining Corp.
9.39%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
7.35%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
4.55%
Kinross Gold Corp.
4.30%
Gold Fields Ltd.
4.26%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
3.82%
Pan American Silver Corp.
3.31%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
3.25%
Alamos Gold, Inc.
2.46%
Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.
1.96%
IAMGOLD Corp.
1.93%
Eldorado Gold Corp.
1.79%
Endeavour Mining Plc
1.78%
Frequently asked questions about ICOP and RING
How have the ICOP and RING ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 22, 2026, ICOP is up 28.08% year-to-date (YTD), while RING has returned 16.59%. That puts ICOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICOP or RING?
Year-to-date, the ICOP ETF saw +$253M in flows, compared to -$650M for RING.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICOP or RING?
Over the past year, ICOP had a volatility of 39.49%, while RING experienced 49.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICOP or RING?
As of September 22, 2026, ICOP holds $496.16 M in assets under management (AUM), while RING manages $2.59 B.
What sectors do the ICOP and RING ETFs invest in?
ICOP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, RING focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the ICOP ETF and RING ETF?
ICOP top holdings include Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V., Anglo American Plc and BHP Group Ltd.. RING holds in its top three: Newmont Corp., Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. and Barrick Mining Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ICOP or RING?
ICOP holds 45 securities with 78.99% of its assets in the top 15. RING has 42 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.97%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICOP & RING
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Copper ETFs
May 28, 2024
ICOP
Reasons Behind Gold's Surprising Rally
May 13, 2024
RING
Gold Prices Dip Amid Fed Policy Speculations, Impacting Miners
January 23, 2024
RING
Advertisement
Advertisement
