ICOPvsCOPPETF Comparison
VS
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) belong to the same industry segment: Uncategorized Equities. ICOP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, COPP's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Finance and Non-Corporate. ICOP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.78% for COPP. ICOP is up 10.43% year-to-date (YTD) with +$248M in YTD flows. COPP performs worse with 4.69% YTD performance, and +$157M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICOP and COPP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICOP vs COPP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICOP COPP | -10.93%-14.84% | -8.03%-6.43% | +10.43%+4.69% | +36.02%+28.75% | +130.84%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | ICOP COPP | -$5M- | +$7M-$7M | +$248M+$157M | +$302M+$185M | +$378M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICOP COPP | +34.48%+37.79% | +40.15%+43.13% | +33.70%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | ICOP COPP | -23.09%-22.29% | -25.36%-27.60% | -37.39%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ICOP COPP | 71d70d | 96d96d | 478dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
ICOP | COPP | |
Last sale 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM | $48.81 | $37.18 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $46.79 | $36.09 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICOP | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICOP | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.81 | $37.18 |
| 1D performance | +4.32% | +3.02% |
| AuM | $422.92 M | $242.80 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.78% |
Characteristics
ICOP | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index | Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index |
| N° of holdings | 65 | 75 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2023 | March 5, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICOP
Canada
29.87%
USA
19.07%
United Kingdom
16.21%
Australia
13.17%
Mexico
8.6%
Other
13.07%
COPP
Canada
38.06%
USA
29.52%
United Kingdom
8.47%
Other
23.95%
Sectors
ICOP
Non-Energy Materi.
96.02%
Other
3.98%
COPP
Non-Energy Materi.
93.28%
Other
6.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
ICOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
76.82%
COPP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
85.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
ICOP
Anglo American Plc
8.39%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
8.24%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
8.19%
BHP Group Ltd.
7.80%
Teck Resources Limited
5.82%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.92%
Newmont Corp.
4.88%
Antofagasta Plc
4.62%
Lundin Mining Corp.
4.38%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
4.08%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
3.22%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
3.19%
Rio Tinto Plc
3.10%
Barrick Mining Corp.
3.00%
Glencore Plc
2.98%
COPP
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
23.84%
Teck Resources Limited
10.38%
Antofagasta Plc
8.31%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
5.23%
CA85210C1005
5.21%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.96%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
4.57%
Lundin Mining Corp.
4.55%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
4.12%
Capstone Copper Corp.
3.13%
Sandfire Resources Ltd.
2.76%
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
2.47%
MMG Ltd.
2.40%
PT Amman Mineral Internasional Tbk
2.23%
Ero Copper Corp.
1.63%
Frequently asked questions about ICOP and COPP
How have the ICOP and COPP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, ICOP is up 10.43% year-to-date (YTD), while COPP has returned 4.69%. That puts ICOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICOP or COPP?
Year-to-date, the ICOP ETF saw +$248M in flows, compared to +$157M for COPP.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICOP or COPP?
Over the past year, ICOP had a volatility of 40.15%, while COPP experienced 43.13%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICOP or COPP?
As of November 4, 2026, ICOP holds $422.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while COPP manages $242.80 M.
What sectors do the ICOP and COPP ETFs invest in?
ICOP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, COPP focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the ICOP ETF and COPP ETF?
ICOP top holdings include Anglo American Plc, Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.. COPP holds in its top three: Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Teck Resources Limited and Antofagasta Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICOP or COPP?
ICOP holds 65 securities with 76.82% of its assets in the top 15. COPP has 244 securities and a top 15 weight of 85.8%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICOP & COPP
ETF Comparison: Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Versus Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP)
February 6, 2026
COPP
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
COPP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
COPP
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Copper ETFs
May 28, 2024
ICOP
COPP
Advertisement
Advertisement
