ICLNvsURNMETF Comparison
VS
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.75% for URNM. ICLN is up 8.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$147M in YTD flows. URNM performs worse with 3.61% YTD performance, and +$411M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICLN vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICLN URNM | -1.24%+4.19% | -10.30%+5.11% | +8.83%+3.61% | +23.23%+9.34% | +20.01%+54.39% | -15.79%+75.19% |
| Flows | ICLN URNM | +$86M+$78M | -$498M+$85M | +$147M+$411M | +$273M+$381M | -$1.13B+$584M | -$2.00B+$1.24B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICLN URNM | +31.97%+41.31% | +28.90%+43.56% | +24.59%+37.19% | +26.58%+40.54% |
| Max drawdown | ICLN URNM | -21.80%-18.08% | -28.47%-42.35% | -31.13%-50.18% | -56.66%-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICLN URNM | 80d66d | 100d224d | 631d485d | 1774d485d |
Trading data
ICLN | URNM | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $17.94 | $52.38 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $17.82 | $54.63 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICLN | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICLN | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $17.94 | $52.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.67% | -4.12% |
| AuM | $2.12 B | $2.16 B |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
ICLN | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 104 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2008 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICLN
USA
36.76%
China
22.42%
Other
40.81%
URNM
Canada
57.74%
Australia
15.55%
USA
12.92%
Other
13.79%
Sectors
ICLN
Industrials
48.56%
Utilities
41.75%
Technology
7.31%
Other
2.39%
URNM
Energy
75.4%
Non-Corporate
14.5%
Industrials
8.62%
Other
1.48%
Diversification
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.72%
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
92.27%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ICLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.92%
First Solar, Inc.
7.85%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.54%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.96%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.56%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.65%
Equatorial SA
3.30%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.70%
EDP SA
2.68%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.46%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.35%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
2.22%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.00%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.91%
Ørsted A/S
1.62%
URNM
Cameco Corp.
19.40%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
14.50%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
12.73%
Denison Mines Corp.
5.06%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.82%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.62%
Deep Yellow Ltd.
4.54%
CGN Mining Co. Ltd.
4.32%
Yellow Cake Plc
4.30%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.14%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.14%
Ur-Energy, Inc.
2.78%
Bannerman Energy Ltd.
2.57%
IsoEnergy Ltd.
2.24%
Boss Energy Ltd.
2.11%
Frequently asked questions about ICLN and URNM
How have the ICLN and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, ICLN is up 8.83% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has returned 3.61%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICLN or URNM?
Year-to-date, the ICLN ETF saw +$147M in flows, compared to +$411M for URNM.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICLN or URNM?
Over the past year, ICLN had a volatility of 28.9%, while URNM experienced 43.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICLN or URNM?
As of September 10, 2026, ICLN holds $2.12 B in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $2.16 B.
What sectors do the ICLN and URNM ETFs invest in?
ICLN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ICLN ETF and URNM ETF?
ICLN top holdings include China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc.. URNM holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: ICLN or URNM?
ICLN holds 104 securities with 59.72% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 92.27%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICLN & URNM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
URNM
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
URNM
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
