ICLNvsURNMETF Comparison
VS
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Materials. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.75% for URNM. ICLN is up 22.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$101M in YTD flows. URNM performs better with 23.38% YTD performance, and +$299M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICLN vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICLN URNM | +12.48%+11.67% | +8.46%-8.56% | +22.65%+23.38% | +71.98%+105.12% | +11.47%+154.93% | -11.78%+182.67% |
| Flows | ICLN URNM | +$78M+$97M | +$101M+$233M | +$101M+$299M | +$188M+$31M | -$1.68B+$489M | -$1.51B+$1.29B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICLN URNM | +29.24%+49.08% | +23.54%+41.20% | +22.55%+35.25% | +25.57%+40.48% |
| Max drawdown | ICLN URNM | -8.79%-28.40% | -10.55%-28.40% | -42.90%-50.18% | -56.66%-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICLN URNM | 47d86d | 77d86d | 987d485d | 1638d485d |
Trading data
ICLN | URNM | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.84 | $65.96 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $20.18 | $68.74 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICLN | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICLN | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.84 | $65.96 |
| 1D performance | -1.68% | -4.04% |
| AuM | $2.44 B | $2.45 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
ICLN | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 90 | 17 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2008 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICLN
USA
42.34%
China
17.6%
Brazil
8.48%
Spain
8.19%
Other
23.39%
URNM
Canada
46.11%
Australia
15.02%
USA
9.61%
Other
29.26%
Sectors
ICLN
Utilities
43.42%
Industrials
25.6%
Information Techn.
14.4%
Other
16.58%
URNM
Energy
65.7%
Other
34.3%
Advertisement
Diversification
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.24%
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.68%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
ICLN
US65290E1010
10.17%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
9.40%
FIRST SOLAR
6.13%
IBERDROLA SA
5.76%
YANGTZE POWER
4.70%
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES
3.19%
ENPHASE ENERGY
3.04%
EQUATORIAL ENERGIA
2.90%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
2.69%
ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL
2.24%
CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER
2.11%
ORSTED
2.08%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC
2.05%
PLUG POWER
1.93%
SOLAREDGE TECH/D
1.87%
URNM
CAMECO
20.60%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
12.60%
URANIUM ENERGY
4.91%
US63253R2013
4.70%
DENISON MINES
4.69%
ENERGY FUELS
4.67%
PALADIN ENERGY
4.39%
CGN MINING
4.17%
YELLOW CAKE PLC
4.01%
DEEP YELLOW
3.89%
UR ENERGY
2.49%
AU000000BMN9
2.37%
BOSS ENERGY
2.05%
HYLEA METALS
1.08%
GLOBAL ATOMIC CORP
1.06%
Frequently asked questions about ICLN and URNM
How have the ICLN and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, ICLN is up 22.65% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has returned 23.38%. That puts URNM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICLN or URNM?
Year-to-date, the ICLN ETF saw +$101M in flows, compared to +$299M for URNM.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICLN or URNM?
Over the past year, ICLN had a volatility of 23.54%, while URNM experienced 41.2%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICLN or URNM?
As of April 27, 2026, ICLN holds $2.44 B in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $2.45 B.
What sectors do the ICLN and URNM ETFs invest in?
ICLN leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the ICLN ETF and URNM ETF?
ICLN top holdings include US65290E1010, BLOOM ENERGY CORP and FIRST SOLAR. URNM holds in its top three: CAMECO, NEXGEN ENERGY LTD and URANIUM ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICLN or URNM?
ICLN holds 100 securities with 60.24% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 18 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.68%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICLN & URNM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
URNM
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
