ICLNvsLITETF Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.75% for LIT. ICLN is up 8.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$147M in YTD flows. LIT performs better with 14.59% YTD performance, and -$117M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ICLN vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICLN LIT | -1.24%-0.88% | -10.30%-6.57% | +8.83%+14.59% | +23.23%+48.69% | +20.01%+31.33% | -15.79%-8.34% |
| Flows | ICLN LIT | +$86M-$29M | -$498M-$294M | +$147M-$117M | +$273M-$118M | -$1.13B-$1.23B | -$2.00B-$1.61B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICLN LIT | +31.97%+28.20% | +28.90%+27.32% | +24.59%+26.49% | +26.58%+26.01% |
| Max drawdown | ICLN LIT | -21.80%-19.92% | -28.47%-25.52% | -31.13%-42.55% | -56.66%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICLN LIT | 80d85d | 100d121d | 631d745d | 1774d1752d |
ICLN | LIT | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:45 PM | $18.02 | $71.77 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $17.82 | $71.81 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ICLN | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ICLN | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $18.02 | $71.77 |
| 1D performance | +1.09% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $2.12 B | $1.56 B |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.75% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
