ICLNvsLITETF Comparison
VS
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, LIT's top sector exposures are Materials, Industrials and Information Technology. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.75% for LIT. ICLN is up 28.07% year-to-date (YTD) with +$646M in YTD flows. LIT performs worse with 19.85% YTD performance, and +$176M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICLN vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICLN LIT | -0.34%-12.46% | +17.02%+11.03% | +28.07%+19.85% | +65.06%+109.86% | +17.96%+26.36% | +0.04%+18.85% |
| Flows | ICLN LIT | +$387M+$124M | +$623M+$118M | +$646M+$176M | +$765M+$221M | -$975M-$1.14B | -$1.36B-$726M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICLN LIT | +32.30%+27.26% | +25.89%+27.27% | +23.45%+25.82% | +25.84%+26.19% |
| Max drawdown | ICLN LIT | -11.30%-13.66% | -11.30%-13.66% | -42.62%-51.18% | -56.66%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICLN LIT | 6d28d | 6d28d | 924d895d | 1680d1659d |
Trading data
ICLN | LIT | |
Last sale 6/9/2026 at 6:59 PM | $20.66 | $78.40 |
| Previous close 06/08/2026 | $21.00 | $77.09 |
| Consolidated volume 06/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICLN | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/9/2026 at 6:59 PM
Live
Closed
ICLN | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.66 | $78.40 |
| 1D performance | -1.62% | +1.70% |
| AuM | $3.06 B | $1.94 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.75% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICLN
USA
43.27%
China
20.36%
Other
36.38%
LIT
USA
34.43%
China
33.42%
Republic of Korea
13.2%
Australia
8.99%
Japan
7.28%
Other
2.68%
Sectors
ICLN
Utilities
34.36%
Industrials
33.07%
Information Techn.
17.31%
Other
15.26%
LIT
Materials
32.35%
Industrials
18.52%
Information Techn.
14.84%
Consumer Discreti.
9.35%
Other
24.94%
Advertisement
Diversification
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.6%
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.74%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
ICLN
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
13.73%
US65290E1010
7.28%
FIRST SOLAR
7.15%
YANGTZE POWER
5.89%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
3.35%
PLUG POWER
3.28%
ENPHASE ENERGY
3.24%
EQUATORIAL ENERGIA
2.87%
SUZLON ENERGY
2.36%
ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL
2.33%
CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER
2.01%
SOLAREDGE TECH/D
1.93%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC
1.88%
ORSTED
1.84%
ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY
1.47%
LIT
US7672041008
19.03%
SAMSUNG SDI
7.20%
ALBEMARLE
6.77%
PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION
4.29%
PILBARA MINERALS
4.02%
GANFENG LITHIUM
3.99%
US8336351056
3.93%
NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
3.58%
AMPEREX TECH
3.49%
TIANQI LITHIUM
3.24%
TDK
3.00%
TINCI MATERIALS
2.90%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
2.82%
BYD
2.79%
EVE ENERGY
2.71%
Frequently asked questions about ICLN and LIT
How have the ICLN and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 8, 2026, ICLN is up 28.07% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has returned 19.85%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICLN or LIT?
Year-to-date, the ICLN ETF saw +$646M in flows, compared to +$176M for LIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICLN or LIT?
Over the past year, ICLN had a volatility of 25.89%, while LIT experienced 27.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICLN or LIT?
As of June 8, 2026, ICLN holds $3.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $1.94 B.
What sectors do the ICLN and LIT ETFs invest in?
ICLN leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, LIT focuses on Materials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the ICLN ETF and LIT ETF?
ICLN top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, US65290E1010 and FIRST SOLAR. LIT holds in its top three: US7672041008, SAMSUNG SDI and ALBEMARLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICLN or LIT?
ICLN holds 105 securities with 60.6% of its assets in the top 15. LIT has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.74%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICLN & LIT
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
ICLN
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
Advertisement
