ICLNvsLITETF Comparison
VS
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ICLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. In contrast, LIT's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. ICLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.75% for LIT. ICLN is up 8.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$377M in YTD flows. LIT performs worse with 5.29% YTD performance, and -$60M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICLN and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ICLN vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICLN LIT | -13.08%-13.70% | -10.70%-17.91% | +8.82%+5.29% | +29.32%+53.70% | -0.54%+8.01% | -15.11%-11.66% |
| Flows | ICLN LIT | -$260M-$66M | +$276M-$110M | +$377M-$60M | +$515M-$59M | -$1.04B-$1.37B | -$1.73B-$1.12B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICLN LIT | +37.00%+29.75% | +28.31%+28.50% | +24.37%+26.41% | +26.38%+26.28% |
| Max drawdown | ICLN LIT | -24.63%-25.43% | -24.63%-25.43% | -41.79%-49.84% | -56.66%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICLN LIT | 52d74d | 52d74d | 911d875d | 1726d1705d |
Trading data
ICLN | LIT | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $17.78 | $67.81 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $18.37 | $69.02 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ICLN | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ICLN | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $17.78 | $67.81 |
| 1D performance | -3.21% | -1.75% |
| AuM | $2.35 B | $1.49 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.75% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ICLN
USA
45.59%
China
18.15%
Other
36.26%
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
Sectors
ICLN
Industrials
56.7%
Utilities
33.46%
Technology
7.95%
Other
1.88%
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
Advertisement
Diversification
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.9%
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ICLN
Bloom Energy Corp.
14.75%
First Solar, Inc.
8.41%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.32%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
5.78%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.87%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.11%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.85%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.65%
Equatorial SA
2.56%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.52%
EDP SA
2.25%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.22%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.60%
Ørsted A/S
1.55%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
1.46%
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
Frequently asked questions about ICLN and LIT
How have the ICLN and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, ICLN is up 8.82% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has returned 5.29%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICLN or LIT?
Year-to-date, the ICLN ETF saw +$377M in flows, compared to -$60M for LIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICLN or LIT?
Over the past year, ICLN had a volatility of 28.31%, while LIT experienced 28.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICLN or LIT?
As of July 24, 2026, ICLN holds $2.35 B in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $1.49 B.
What sectors do the ICLN and LIT ETFs invest in?
ICLN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, LIT focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the ICLN ETF and LIT ETF?
ICLN top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc.. LIT holds in its top three: Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ICLN or LIT?
ICLN holds 104 securities with 63.9% of its assets in the top 15. LIT has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.8%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ICLN & LIT
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
ICLN
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
Advertisement
