Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ICFvsSCHHETF Comparison
iShares Select U.S. REIT ETF (ICF) and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH) belong to the same industry segment: US Real Estate. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Real Estate. ICF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.07% for SCHH. ICF is up 7.59% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. SCHH performs worse with 7.1% YTD performance, and +$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ICF and SCHH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ICF vs SCHH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ICF SCHH | +0.23%-0.36% | +7.52%+7.03% | +7.59%+7.10% | +8.07%+7.85% | +28.78%+28.89% | +30.38%+28.41% |
| Flows | ICF SCHH | -$3M-$118K | +$26M+$314M | -$10M+$40M | -$44M+$1.52B | -$525M+$2.74B | -$159M+$3.64B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ICF SCHH | +13.40%+12.36% | +16.37%+16.18% | +17.13%+17.04% | +18.96%+18.73% |
| Max drawdown | ICF SCHH | -3.41%-3.66% | -11.88%-12.36% | -17.30%-17.71% | -34.65%-33.31% |
| Max drawdown duration | ICF SCHH | 17d17d | 29d82d | 513d512d | 1529d1529d |
ICF | SCHH | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.81 | $22.22 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $64.21 | $22.37 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ICF | SCHH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ICF | SCHH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.81 | $22.22 |
| 1D performance | -0.62% | -0.67% |
| AuM | $2.04 B | $9.42 B |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.07% |
ICF | SCHH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Cohen & Steers Realty Majors Portfolio Index | Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 106 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 29, 2001 | January 13, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ICF and SCHH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ICF is up 7.59% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHH has returned 7.1%. That puts ICF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ICF or SCHH?
Year-to-date, the ICF ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to +$40M for SCHH.
Which ETF is more volatile: ICF or SCHH?
Over the past year, ICF had a volatility of 16.37%, while SCHH experienced 16.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: ICF or SCHH?
As of March 11, 2026, ICF holds $2.04 B in assets under management (AUM), while SCHH manages $9.42 B.
What sectors do the ICF and SCHH ETFs invest in?
ICF leans toward sectors like Real Estate. Meanwhile, SCHH focuses on Real Estate.
What are the top holdings of the ICF ETF and SCHH ETF?
ICF top holdings include PROLOGIS REIT, AMERICAN TOWER CL A REIT and EQUINIX INC COMMON STOCK REIT. SCHH holds in its top three: WELLTOWER INC, PROLOGIS REIT and EQUINIX INC COMMON STOCK REIT.
Which ETF is more diversified: ICF or SCHH?
ICF holds 31 securities with 74.98% of its assets in the top 15. SCHH has 119 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.71%.
4 Ways to Generate Income with ETFs
ETF Comparison: Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH) Versus Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ)
Exploring Sector Rotation: Value vs. Growth
Two Ways to Get Real Estate Income with ETFs
Real Estate Sector Declines on Fed Minutes
Real Estate Sector Declines on Fed Minutes
Real Estate Sector Suffers Third Weekly Loss Amid Rising Treasury Yields
Real Estate ETFs Hit Again by the Rise in Treasury Yields
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
