IBATvsURNMETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.75% for URNM. IBAT is up 43.53% year-to-date (YTD) with +$48M in YTD flows. URNM performs worse with -0.14% YTD performance, and +$411M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT URNM | +0.66%+0.42% | -4.83%+6.30% | +43.53%-0.14% | +55.69%+5.48% | n/a+48.81% | n/a+57.36% |
| Flows | IBAT URNM | -$5M+$78M | -$9M+$93M | +$48M+$411M | +$50M+$380M | -+$584M | -+$1.22B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT URNM | +36.18%+40.85% | +31.47%+43.72% | n/a+37.23% | n/a+40.44% |
| Max drawdown | IBAT URNM | -25.61%-18.08% | -25.61%-42.35% | n/a-50.18% | n/a-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT URNM | 81d66d | 81d225d | n/a485d | n/a485d |
Trading data
IBAT | URNM | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:37 PM | $39.78 | $50.12 |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $41.01 | $52.38 |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:37 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.78 | $50.12 |
| 1D performance | -2.99% | -4.31% |
| AuM | $68.68 M | $2.08 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
IBAT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 79 | 25 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2024 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
26.85%
USA
21.35%
France
11.3%
Republic of Korea
10.56%
China
9.82%
Germany
7.42%
Other
12.7%
URNM
Canada
57.74%
Australia
15.55%
USA
12.92%
Other
13.79%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
42.47%
Non-Energy Materi.
39.31%
Technology
12.13%
Other
6.1%
URNM
Energy
75.4%
Non-Corporate
14.5%
Industrials
8.62%
Other
1.48%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.31%
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
92.27%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IBAT
Bloom Energy Corp.
7.62%
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
7.41%
BASF SE
7.19%
Air Liquide SA
7.14%
TDK Corp.
5.46%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
4.95%
Schneider Electric SE
4.03%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
3.93%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Linde Plc
3.70%
Eaton Corp. Plc
3.69%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.62%
Asahi Kasei Corp.
3.57%
Resonac Holdings Corp.
3.24%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
2.99%
URNM
Cameco Corp.
19.40%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
14.50%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
12.73%
Denison Mines Corp.
5.06%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.82%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.62%
Deep Yellow Ltd.
4.54%
CGN Mining Co. Ltd.
4.32%
Yellow Cake Plc
4.30%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.14%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.14%
Ur-Energy, Inc.
2.78%
Bannerman Energy Ltd.
2.57%
IsoEnergy Ltd.
2.24%
Boss Energy Ltd.
2.11%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and URNM
How have the IBAT and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, IBAT is up 43.53% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has lost -0.14%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or URNM?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$48M in flows, compared to +$411M for URNM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or URNM?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 31.47%, while URNM experienced 43.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or URNM?
As of September 11, 2026, IBAT holds $68.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $2.08 B.
What sectors do the IBAT and URNM ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and URNM ETF?
IBAT top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. and BASF SE. URNM holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or URNM?
IBAT holds 83 securities with 72.31% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 92.27%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & URNM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
URNM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URNM
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
February 8, 2024
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
February 8, 2024
URNM
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URNM
Sprott’s Uranium Pure Play
November 7, 2023
URNM
Advertisement
