IBATvsURNMETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Materials. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.75% for URNM. IBAT is up 44.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$39M in YTD flows. URNM performs worse with 28.04% YTD performance, and +$299M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT URNM | +23.75%+18.56% | +28.54%-6.33% | +44.60%+28.04% | +103.87%+137.62% | n/a+164.55% | n/a+201.32% |
| Flows | IBAT URNM | +$15M+$83M | +$24M+$251M | +$39M+$299M | +$42M+$30M | -+$488M | -+$1.29B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT URNM | +31.38%+48.92% | +23.80%+41.75% | n/a+35.25% | n/a+40.46% |
| Max drawdown | IBAT URNM | -11.58%-28.40% | -11.92%-28.40% | n/a-50.18% | n/a-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT URNM | 42d84d | 79d84d | n/a485d | n/a485d |
Trading data
IBAT | URNM | |
Last sale 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.45 | $67.01 |
| Previous close 04/23/2026 | $40.95 | $69.13 |
| Consolidated volume 04/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.45 | $67.01 |
| 1D performance | +1.22% | -3.07% |
| AuM | $61.21 M | $2.54 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
IBAT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 61 | 17 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2024 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
22.93%
USA
21.54%
Republic of Korea
15.5%
France
9.33%
China
9.01%
Other
21.71%
URNM
Canada
46.11%
Australia
15.02%
USA
9.61%
Other
29.26%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
39.65%
Materials
35.25%
Information Techn.
19.44%
Other
5.66%
URNM
Energy
65.7%
Other
34.3%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.3%
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.68%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
IBAT
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
7.05%
BASF SE
6.63%
AIR LIQUIDE
6.38%
SAMSUNG SDI
6.34%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS
6.13%
MURATA MFG
5.62%
AMPEREX TECH
5.35%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
4.57%
FURUKAWA ELEC
4.54%
ASAHI KASEI
4.21%
LG CHEMICAL
3.42%
EATON CORP PLC
3.23%
IE000S9YS762
3.18%
ABB
2.86%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
2.82%
URNM
CAMECO
20.60%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
12.60%
URANIUM ENERGY
4.91%
US63253R2013
4.70%
DENISON MINES
4.69%
ENERGY FUELS
4.67%
PALADIN ENERGY
4.39%
CGN MINING
4.17%
YELLOW CAKE PLC
4.01%
DEEP YELLOW
3.89%
UR ENERGY
2.49%
AU000000BMN9
2.37%
BOSS ENERGY
2.05%
HYLEA METALS
1.08%
GLOBAL ATOMIC CORP
1.06%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and URNM
How have the IBAT and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, IBAT is up 44.6% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has returned 28.04%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or URNM?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$39M in flows, compared to +$299M for URNM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or URNM?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 23.8%, while URNM experienced 41.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or URNM?
As of April 24, 2026, IBAT holds $61.21 M in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $2.54 B.
What sectors do the IBAT and URNM ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and URNM ETF?
IBAT top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, BASF SE and AIR LIQUIDE. URNM holds in its top three: CAMECO, NEXGEN ENERGY LTD and URANIUM ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or URNM?
IBAT holds 64 securities with 72.3% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 18 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.68%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & URNM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
URNM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URNM
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
February 8, 2024
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
February 8, 2024
URNM
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URNM
Sprott’s Uranium Pure Play
November 7, 2023
URNM
Advertisement
