BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

IBATvsURNMETF Comparison

ETF 1

IBAT

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

This fund is part of

Alternative Energy

+0.64%

Full IBAT fund page

VS

ETF 2

URNM

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF

This fund is part of

Alternative Energy

+0.64%

Full URNM fund page

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.75% for URNM. IBAT is up 32.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$43M in YTD flows. URNM performs worse with -19.29% YTD performance, and +$479M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

IBAT vs URNM performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 10/28/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	IBAT URNM	-5.84%-7.83%	+2.94%-11.32%	+32.06%-19.29%	+20.17%-20.64%	n/a+11.04%	n/a+14.39%
Flows	IBAT URNM	-+$49M	-$10M+$166M	+$43M+$479M	+$43M+$475M	-+$506M	-+$1.02B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	IBAT URNM	+29.96%+39.54%	+31.57%+43.79%	n/a+37.46%	n/a+39.28%
Max drawdown	IBAT URNM	-16.17%-31.79%	-25.61%-49.52%	n/a-50.18%	n/a-50.18%
Max drawdown duration	IBAT URNM	22d62d	128d272d	n/a485d	n/a485d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	IBAT	URNM
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 7:59 PM	$37.48	$45.08
Previous close 10/28/2026	$36.92	$45.79
Consolidated volume 10/28/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of September 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	IBAT	URNM
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 10/28/2026 at 7:59 PM

Live

Closed

	IBAT	URNM
Last price	$37.48	$45.08
1D performance	+1.51%	-1.55%
AuM	$58.68 M	$1.75 B
E/R	0.47%	0.75%

Characteristics

	IBAT	URNM
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	iShares	Sprott ETFs
Benchmark	STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index	North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index
N° of holdings	79	25
Asset class	-	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	March 19, 2024	November 29, 2019
ESG	Yes	No

More IBAT data on Trackinsight

More URNM data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

IBAT

Japan

27.64%

USA

19.74%

Republic of Korea

14.24%

France

10.47%

China

8.58%

Germany

7.09%

Other

12.23%

URNM

Canada

56.48%

Australia

16.81%

USA

13.69%

Other

13.02%

Sectors

IBAT

Industrials

43.94%

Non-Energy Materi.

37.27%

Technology

12.83%

Other

5.96%

URNM

Energy

77.17%

Non-Corporate

13.63%

Industrials

7.96%

Other

1.24%

Diversification

IBAT

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

71.81%

URNM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

92.29%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026

IBAT

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.

6.98%

Bloom Energy Corp.

6.93%

BASF SE

6.86%

Air Liquide SA

6.50%

Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.

6.07%

TDK Corp.

5.45%

Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

5.06%

Resonac Holdings Corp.

3.86%

Schneider Electric SE

3.85%

Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.

3.75%

Eaton Corp. Plc

3.50%

LG Energy Solution Ltd.

3.40%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.

3.33%

Linde Plc

3.25%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.

3.01%

URNM

Cameco Corp.

18.91%

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust

13.63%

NexGen Energy Ltd.

12.42%

Denison Mines Corp.

5.22%

Paladin Energy Ltd.

4.95%

Deep Yellow Ltd.

4.91%

National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC

4.84%

Energy Fuels, Inc.

4.55%

Uranium Energy Corp.

4.50%

CGN Mining Co. Ltd.

4.01%

Yellow Cake Plc

3.95%

Bannerman Energy Ltd.

3.22%

Ur-Energy, Inc.

2.76%

IsoEnergy Ltd.

2.30%

Boss Energy Ltd.

2.13%

Frequently asked questions about IBAT and URNM

How have the IBAT and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 28, 2026, IBAT is up 32.06% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has lost -19.29%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or URNM?

Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$43M in flows, compared to +$479M for URNM.

Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or URNM?

Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 31.57%, while URNM experienced 43.79%.

Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or URNM?

As of October 28, 2026, IBAT holds $58.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $1.75 B.

What sectors do the IBAT and URNM ETFs invest in?

IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and URNM ETF?

IBAT top holdings include Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Bloom Energy Corp. and BASF SE. URNM holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and NexGen Energy Ltd..

IBATvsURNMETF Comparison

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF

IBAT vs URNM performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the IBAT and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 28, 2026, IBAT is up 32.06% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has lost -19.29%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or URNM?

Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$43M in flows, compared to +$479M for URNM.

Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or URNM?

Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 31.57%, while URNM experienced 43.79%.

Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or URNM?

As of October 28, 2026, IBAT holds $58.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $1.75 B.

What sectors do the IBAT and URNM ETFs invest in?

IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and URNM ETF?

IBAT top holdings include Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Bloom Energy Corp. and BASF SE. URNM holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and NexGen Energy Ltd..

Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or URNM?

IBAT holds 83 securities with 71.81% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 92.29%.

ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)

How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy

Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs

Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)

There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium

Sprott’s Uranium Pure Play

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection