IBATvsTANETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, TAN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.7% for TAN. IBAT is up 43.53% year-to-date (YTD) with +$48M in YTD flows. TAN performs worse with -4.09% YTD performance, and +$118M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and TAN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs TAN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT TAN | +0.66%-10.47% | -4.83%-24.01% | +43.53%-4.09% | +55.69%+12.63% | n/a-14.82% | n/a-44.36% |
| Flows | IBAT TAN | -$5M-$224M | -$9M-$480M | +$48M+$118M | +$50M+$255M | --$80M | --$575M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT TAN | +36.18%+35.23% | +31.47%+34.85% | n/a+36.25% | n/a+36.27% |
| Max drawdown | IBAT TAN | -25.61%-25.39% | -25.61%-36.40% | n/a-53.60% | n/a-73.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT TAN | 81d89d | 81d103d | n/a866d | n/a1775d |
Trading data
IBAT | TAN | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 3:02 PM | $39.56 | $46.23 |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $41.01 | $47.15 |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 3:02 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.56 | $46.23 |
| 1D performance | -3.53% | -1.96% |
| AuM | $68.68 M | $996.09 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.7% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
26.85%
USA
21.35%
France
11.3%
Republic of Korea
10.56%
China
9.82%
Germany
7.42%
Other
12.7%
TAN
USA
44.51%
Israel
22.15%
China
8.15%
Other
25.19%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
42.47%
Non-Energy Materi.
39.31%
Technology
12.13%
Other
6.1%
TAN
Industrials
44.91%
Utilities
34.17%
Technology
10.53%
Other
10.38%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.31%
TAN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.02%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IBAT
Bloom Energy Corp.
7.62%
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
7.41%
BASF SE
7.19%
Air Liquide SA
7.14%
TDK Corp.
5.46%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
4.95%
Schneider Electric SE
4.03%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
3.93%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Linde Plc
3.70%
Eaton Corp. Plc
3.69%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.62%
Asahi Kasei Corp.
3.57%
Resonac Holdings Corp.
3.24%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
2.99%
TAN
Nextpower, Inc.
9.93%
First Solar, Inc.
9.73%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
7.54%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
6.29%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd.
4.59%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
4.39%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
4.24%
Sunrun, Inc.
4.18%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
3.54%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
3.50%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
3.37%
Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente SA
3.16%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.
2.95%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
2.90%
SMA Solar Technology AG
2.69%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and TAN
How have the IBAT and TAN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, IBAT is up 43.53% year-to-date (YTD), while TAN has lost -4.09%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or TAN?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$48M in flows, compared to +$118M for TAN.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or TAN?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 31.47%, while TAN experienced 34.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or TAN?
As of September 11, 2026, IBAT holds $68.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while TAN manages $996.09 M.
What sectors do the IBAT and TAN ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, TAN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and TAN ETF?
IBAT top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. and BASF SE. TAN holds in its top three: Nextpower, Inc., First Solar, Inc. and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or TAN?
IBAT holds 83 securities with 72.31% of its assets in the top 15. TAN has 35 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.02%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & TAN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
TAN
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
TAN
Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch
September 20, 2022
TAN
Advertisement
Investing in solar energy with ETFs
June 7, 2022
TAN
Investing in solar energy with ETFs
June 7, 2022
TAN
Advertisement
