Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
HGROvsITOTETF Comparison
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF (HGRO) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) is part of the US All Cap segment. HGRO's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, ITOT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. HGRO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.03% for ITOT. HGRO is up 0.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$14M in YTD flows. ITOT performs worse with -0.64% YTD performance, and +$1.98B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HGRO and ITOT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
HGRO vs ITOT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HGRO ITOT | -3.28%-2.44% | -0.99%-1.70% | +0.35%-0.64% | n/a+23.07% | n/a+80.18% | n/a+72.64% |
| Flows | HGRO ITOT | +$7M+$672M | +$22M+$2.54B | +$14M+$1.98B | -+$6.66B | -+$12.24B | -+$18.01B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HGRO ITOT | +13.96%+12.22% | n/a+18.62% | n/a+15.22% | n/a+17.34% |
| Max drawdown | HGRO ITOT | -5.65%-3.45% | n/a-14.10% | n/a-19.43% | n/a-25.39% |
| Max drawdown duration | HGRO ITOT | 14d43d | n/a45d | n/a127d | n/a711d |
HGRO | ITOT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.94 | $145.34 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $28.44 | $147.69 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
HGRO | ITOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
HGRO | ITOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.94 | $145.34 |
| 1D performance | -1.76% | -1.59% |
| AuM | $82.52 M | $81.53 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.03% |
HGRO | ITOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Hedgeye Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Total Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 2188 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 10, 2025 | January 20, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the HGRO and ITOT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, HGRO is up 0.35% year-to-date (YTD), while ITOT has lost -0.64%. That puts HGRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HGRO or ITOT?
Year-to-date, the HGRO ETF saw +$14M in flows, compared to +$1.98B for ITOT.
Which ETF is bigger: HGRO or ITOT?
As of March 11, 2026, HGRO holds $82.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while ITOT manages $81.53 B.
What sectors do the HGRO and ITOT ETFs invest in?
HGRO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, ITOT focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the HGRO ETF and ITOT ETF?
HGRO top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and APPLE. ITOT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: HGRO or ITOT?
HGRO holds 49 securities with 56.68% of its assets in the top 15. ITOT has 2481 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.77%.
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
