HFNDvsDBMFETF Comparison
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) and iMGP DBi MANAGED FUTURES STRATEGY ETF (DBMF) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. HFND is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.07%, versus 0.85% for DBMF. HFND is up 8.76% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. DBMF performs better with 10.38% YTD performance, and +$1.70B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HFND and DBMF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
HFND vs DBMF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HFND DBMF | +0.69%-0.55% | +4.41%+0.23% | +8.76%+10.38% | +17.22%+27.40% | +31.35%+33.18% | n/a+47.28% |
| Flows | HFND DBMF | +$2M+$418M | +$1M+$730M | +$2M+$1.70B | +$3M+$2.47B | -$31M+$3.08B | -+$3.90B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HFND DBMF | +10.43%+11.33% | +8.64%+12.52% | +9.13%+10.57% | n/a+12.13% |
| Max drawdown | HFND DBMF | -2.76%-4.97% | -4.92%-6.02% | -12.79%-15.75% | n/a-19.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | HFND DBMF | 21d42d | 50d75d | 154d489d | n/a1155d |
HFND | DBMF | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.82 | |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $30.74 | |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
HFND | DBMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $30.82 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.26% |
| AuM | $34.45 M | $4.02 B |
| E/R | 1.07% | 0.85% |
HFND | DBMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Unlimited | iMGP Funds |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 10, 2022 | May 7, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
