GTRvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. GTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. GTR is up 9.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 13.56% YTD performance, and -$166M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GTR and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GTR vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GTR QYLD | -0.37%+1.24% | +0.41%+4.86% | +9.42%+13.56% | +7.44%+20.25% | +39.52%+52.89% | +19.71%+49.30% |
| Flows | GTR QYLD | -+$42M | +$2M+$58M | +$7M-$166M | +$7M-$263M | -$4M+$85M | +$62M+$4.84B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GTR QYLD | +7.25%+9.78% | +9.43%+11.16% | +10.53%+13.51% | +10.68%+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | GTR QYLD | -2.15%-3.58% | -6.05%-5.84% | -13.04%-19.06% | -21.47%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | GTR QYLD | 43d10d | 48d39d | 206d239d | 1094d771d |
Trading data
GTR | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.11 | $18.32 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $27.32 | $18.74 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GTR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGTR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GTR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.11 | $18.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.78% | -2.24% |
| AuM | $72.01 M | $8.38 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
GTR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | WisdomTree | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE Nasdaq 100 BuyWrite V2 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 7, 2021 | December 11, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
GTR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
GTR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Diversification
GTR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
GTR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about GTR and QYLD
How have the GTR and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, GTR is up 9.42% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 13.56%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GTR or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the GTR ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to -$166M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: GTR or QYLD?
Over the past year, GTR had a volatility of 9.43%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: GTR or QYLD?
As of October 16, 2026, GTR holds $72.01 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.38 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about GTR & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
