Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSIEvsDBEFETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. GSIE is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.35% for DBEF. GSIE is up 2.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$216M in YTD flows. DBEF performs better with 3.61% YTD performance, and -$63M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSIE and DBEF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSIE vs DBEF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSIE DBEF | -4.35%-2.75% | +5.59%+5.53% | +2.98%+3.61% | +25.42%+21.29% | +59.77%+62.20% | +56.20%+86.74% |
| Flows | GSIE DBEF | +$41M-$52M | +$216M-$298M | +$216M-$63M | +$625M-$377M | +$711M+$2.19B | +$1.79B+$2.45B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSIE DBEF | +13.19%+11.63% | +14.73%+13.78% | +12.89%+11.49% | +14.16%+11.76% |
| Max drawdown | GSIE DBEF | -7.37%-6.85% | -13.08%-14.30% | -13.08%-14.53% | -29.44%-14.56% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSIE DBEF | 9d9d | 37d56d | 37d73d | 911d385d |
GSIE | DBEF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.32 | $49.42 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $44.02 | $49.91 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSIE | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSIE | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.32 | $49.42 |
| 1D performance | -1.59% | -0.98% |
| AuM | $5.24 B | $8.41 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.35% |
GSIE | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 598 | 657 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 6, 2015 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSIE and DBEF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GSIE is up 2.98% year-to-date (YTD), while DBEF has returned 3.61%. That puts DBEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSIE or DBEF?
Year-to-date, the GSIE ETF saw +$216M in flows, compared to -$63M for DBEF.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSIE or DBEF?
Over the past year, GSIE had a volatility of 14.73%, while DBEF experienced 13.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSIE or DBEF?
As of March 10, 2026, GSIE holds $5.24 B in assets under management (AUM), while DBEF manages $8.41 B.
What sectors do the GSIE and DBEF ETFs invest in?
GSIE leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, DBEF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GSIE ETF and DBEF ETF?
GSIE top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and NOVARTIS. DBEF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSIE or DBEF?
GSIE holds 629 securities with 12.67% of its assets in the top 15. DBEF has 697 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.46%.
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
