GSIDvsEFAETF Comparison
ETF 1
GSID
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.24%
VS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. GSID is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.32% for EFA. GSID is up 5.57% year-to-date (YTD) with +$40M in YTD flows. EFA performs better with 6.08% YTD performance, and +$354M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSID and EFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GSID vs EFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSID EFA | +6.51%+6.90% | +0.66%+1.19% | +5.57%+6.08% | +26.85%+25.83% | +52.36%+51.85% | +48.87%+50.38% |
| Flows | GSID EFA | +$7M- | +$54M- | +$40M+$354M | +$38M+$2.59B | +$317M+$4.95B | +$441M+$2.48B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSID EFA | +20.15%+21.31% | +13.48%+14.67% | +14.21%+14.72% | +15.43%+16.13% |
| Max drawdown | GSID EFA | -10.70%-11.39% | -10.70%-11.39% | -14.37%-13.68% | -29.33%-29.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSID EFA | 54d58d | 54d58d | 42d41d | 897d892d |
Trading data
GSID | EFA | |
Last sale 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.25 | $101.77 |
| Previous close 04/24/2026 | $72.87 | $101.24 |
| Consolidated volume 04/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GSID | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GSID | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.25 | $101.77 |
| 1D performance | +0.51% | +0.52% |
| AuM | $1.05 B | $75.04 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
GSID | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 834 | 649 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 12, 2020 | August 14, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GSID
Japan
25.46%
United Kingdom
13.97%
Germany
8.12%
France
7.62%
Australia
7.25%
Other
37.58%
EFA
Japan
22.39%
United Kingdom
14.41%
Switzerland
9.4%
France
9.31%
Germany
8.91%
Other
35.58%
Sectors
GSID
Financials
21.08%
Industrials
18.32%
Information Techn.
9.01%
Consumer Discreti.
8.57%
Health Care
7.24%
Other
35.78%
EFA
Financials
23.42%
Industrials
18.27%
Information Techn.
8.48%
Consumer Discreti.
8.24%
Health Care
8.02%
Other
33.57%
Advertisement
Diversification
GSID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.81%
EFA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.81%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
GSID
ASML HOLDING
2.47%
NOVARTIS
1.38%
ASTRAZENECA
1.33%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.33%
SHELL PLC
1.28%
NESTLE SA
1.19%
TOYOTA
1.08%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.96%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.92%
TOTALENERGIES SE
0.89%
SIEMENS
0.86%
BHP GROUP LTD
0.83%
SAP SE
0.82%
ALLIANZ SE
0.74%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
0.72%
EFA
ASML HOLDING
2.47%
ASTRAZENECA
1.49%
NOVARTIS
1.41%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.37%
CH1499059983
1.36%
SHELL PLC
1.33%
NESTLE SA
1.24%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.95%
TOYOTA
0.93%
TOTALENERGIES SE
0.91%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.91%
SIEMENS
0.89%
SAP SE
0.87%
BHP GROUP LTD
0.87%
BANCO SANTANDER SA
0.79%
Frequently asked questions about GSID and EFA
How have the GSID and EFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, GSID is up 5.57% year-to-date (YTD), while EFA has returned 6.08%. That puts EFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSID or EFA?
Year-to-date, the GSID ETF saw +$40M in flows, compared to +$354M for EFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSID or EFA?
Over the past year, GSID had a volatility of 13.48%, while EFA experienced 14.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSID or EFA?
As of April 24, 2026, GSID holds $1.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while EFA manages $75.04 B.
What sectors do the GSID and EFA ETFs invest in?
GSID leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, EFA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the GSID ETF and EFA ETF?
GSID top holdings include ASML HOLDING, NOVARTIS and ASTRAZENECA. EFA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ASTRAZENECA and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSID or EFA?
GSID holds 884 securities with 16.81% of its assets in the top 15. EFA has 690 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.81%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GSID & EFA
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
January 14, 2026
EFA
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
December 23, 2025
EFA
Advertisement
Advertisement
