Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSIDvsDBEFETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. GSID's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, DBEF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. GSID is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.35% for DBEF. GSID is up 3.72% year-to-date (YTD) with -$80M in YTD flows. DBEF performs worse with 3.61% YTD performance, and -$63M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSID and DBEF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSID vs DBEF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSID DBEF | -4.59%-2.75% | +6.13%+5.53% | +3.72%+3.61% | +24.71%+21.29% | +57.80%+62.20% | +53.49%+86.74% |
| Flows | GSID DBEF | --$52M | -$87M-$298M | -$80M-$63M | -$100M-$377M | +$218M+$2.19B | +$321M+$2.45B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSID DBEF | +14.40%+11.63% | +16.13%+13.78% | +13.80%+11.49% | +15.13%+11.76% |
| Max drawdown | GSID DBEF | -8.10%-6.85% | -14.37%-14.30% | -14.37%-14.53% | -29.33%-14.56% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSID DBEF | 9d9d | 42d56d | 42d73d | 897d385d |
GSID | DBEF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.57 | $49.91 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $71.88 | $49.89 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSID | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSID | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.57 | $49.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.42% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $914.09 M | $8.41 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.35% |
GSID | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 841 | 657 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 12, 2020 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSID and DBEF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GSID is up 3.72% year-to-date (YTD), while DBEF has returned 3.61%. That puts GSID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSID or DBEF?
Year-to-date, the GSID ETF saw -$80M in flows, compared to -$63M for DBEF.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSID or DBEF?
Over the past year, GSID had a volatility of 16.13%, while DBEF experienced 13.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSID or DBEF?
As of March 10, 2026, GSID holds $914.09 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBEF manages $8.41 B.
What sectors do the GSID and DBEF ETFs invest in?
GSID leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, DBEF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GSID ETF and DBEF ETF?
GSID top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS. DBEF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSID or DBEF?
GSID holds 889 securities with 17.33% of its assets in the top 15. DBEF has 697 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.46%.
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
