Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GPIQvsHELOETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. GPIQ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, HELO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. GPIQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.5% for HELO. GPIQ is up 0.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$602M in YTD flows. HELO performs worse with -0.67% YTD performance, and +$268M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GPIQ and HELO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GPIQ vs HELO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GPIQ HELO | -0.17%-1.87% | -1.03%-0.96% | +0.23%-0.67% | +28.15%+10.25% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | GPIQ HELO | +$137M+$96M | +$822M+$330M | +$602M+$268M | +$2.54B+$798M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GPIQ HELO | +14.22%+7.63% | +20.59%+8.54% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GPIQ HELO | -4.79%-2.09% | -14.95%-6.97% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GPIQ HELO | 41d30d | 45d46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
GPIQ | HELO | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.88 | $65.24 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $51.63 | $65.95 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
GPIQ | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.88 | $65.24 |
| 1D performance | -1.45% | -1.08% |
| AuM | $3.10 B | $3.86 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.5% |
GPIQ | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 143 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 26, 2023 | September 28, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GPIQ and HELO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GPIQ is up 0.23% year-to-date (YTD), while HELO has lost -0.67%. That puts GPIQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GPIQ or HELO?
Year-to-date, the GPIQ ETF saw +$602M in flows, compared to +$268M for HELO.
Which ETF is more volatile: GPIQ or HELO?
Over the past year, GPIQ had a volatility of 20.59%, while HELO experienced 8.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: GPIQ or HELO?
As of March 10, 2026, GPIQ holds $3.10 B in assets under management (AUM), while HELO manages $3.86 B.
What sectors do the GPIQ and HELO ETFs invest in?
GPIQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, HELO focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the GPIQ ETF and HELO ETF?
GPIQ top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. HELO holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: GPIQ or HELO?
GPIQ holds 99 securities with 58.81% of its assets in the top 15. HELO has 150 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.22%.
Hedged Equity ETFs: Options-Based Alternatives to the 60/40 Portfolio
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
