New

Turn ETF ideas into real portfolios. Try the builder now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

GMARvsQYLDETF Comparison

ETF 1
GMAR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March

This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.98%
VS
ETF 2
QYLD

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF

This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.98%

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. GMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. GMAR is up 10.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 13.56% YTD performance, and -$166M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GMAR and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

GMAR vs QYLD performance and flow charts

Performance

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Cumulative Flows

0 M20 M40 M60 M80 MSep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
GMAR
QYLD
+0.89%+1.24%
+2.04%+4.86%
+10.77%+13.56%
+13.33%+20.25%
+41.29%+52.89%
n/a+49.30%
Flows
GMAR
QYLD
+$27M+$42M
+$23M+$58M
+$3M-$166M
-$21M-$263M
+$220M+$85M
-+$4.84B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
GMAR
QYLD
+2.90%+9.78%
+3.89%+11.16%
+7.09%+13.51%
n/a+15.27%
Max drawdown
GMAR
QYLD
-0.57%-3.58%
-1.94%-5.84%
-9.31%-19.06%
n/a-24.74%
Max drawdown duration
GMAR
QYLD
15d10d
6d39d
103d239d
n/a771d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
GMAR
QYLD
Last sale
10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
$45.44
$18.29
Previous close
10/16/2026
$45.31
$18.32
Consolidated volume
10/16/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

GMAR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
GMAR
QYLD
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GMAR
QYLD
Last price
$45.44
$18.29
1D performance
+0.30%
-0.16%
AuM$426.19 M$8.38 B
E/R0.85%0.6%
Characteristics
GMAR
QYLD
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderFirst TrustGlobal X
Benchmark-CBOE Nasdaq 100 BuyWrite V2 Index
N° of holdings--
Asset class-Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateMarch 17, 2023December 11, 2013
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

GMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon

Sectors

GMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement

Diversification

GMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 1, 1970
GMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about GMAR and QYLD

How have the GMAR and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 16, 2026, GMAR is up 10.77% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 13.56%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GMAR or QYLD?

Year-to-date, the GMAR ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to -$166M for QYLD.

Which ETF is more volatile: GMAR or QYLD?

Over the past year, GMAR had a volatility of 3.89%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.

Which ETF is bigger: GMAR or QYLD?

As of October 16, 2026, GMAR holds $426.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.38 B.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

With 1,790 new products launched by July 2026, choosing is harder than ever. Our Global ETF Survey 2026, built on 620 professional investors and allocators, shows how active, fixed income, options-based and thematic ETFs are reshaping fund selection.

Global ETF Survey 2026