GMARvsQQQIETF Comparison
ETF 1
GMAR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+0.36%
VS
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. GMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. GMAR is up 10.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 11.94% YTD performance, and +$7.58B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GMAR and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GMAR vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GMAR QQQI | +0.89%-2.40% | +2.04%+3.56% | +10.77%+11.94% | +13.33%+13.32% | +41.29%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | GMAR QQQI | +$27M+$342M | +$23M+$2.08B | +$3M+$7.58B | -$21M+$9.38B | +$220M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GMAR QQQI | +2.90%+16.13% | +3.89%+16.87% | +7.09%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GMAR QQQI | -0.57%-6.64% | -1.94%-9.62% | -9.31%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GMAR QQQI | 15d13d | 6d76d | 103dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
GMAR | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.44 | $54.16 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $45.44 | $54.22 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GMAR | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.44 | $54.16 |
| 1D performance | -0.01% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $426.19 M | $15.08 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
GMAR | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 17, 2023 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
GMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
GMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
GMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
GMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about GMAR and QQQI
How have the GMAR and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, GMAR is up 10.77% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has returned 11.94%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GMAR or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the GMAR ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$7.58B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: GMAR or QQQI?
Over the past year, GMAR had a volatility of 3.89%, while QQQI experienced 16.87%.
Which ETF is bigger: GMAR or QQQI?
As of October 16, 2026, GMAR holds $426.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $15.08 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about GMAR & QQQI
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
QQQI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
QQQI
Advertisement
Advertisement
