FTAGvsPHOETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. FTAG's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. FTAG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.59% for PHO. FTAG is up 10.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with 0.03% YTD performance, and -$130M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTAG and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FTAG vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTAG PHO | -6.11%+2.56% | -1.62%+0.25% | +10.35%+0.03% | +13.76%-3.30% | +17.87%+33.80% | +4.78%+27.90% |
| Flows | FTAG PHO | --$21M | --$68M | +$7M-$130M | +$7M-$171M | +$2M-$342M | +$12M-$432M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTAG PHO | +13.05%+15.61% | +13.49%+15.70% | +14.46%+16.56% | +16.63%+18.39% |
| Max drawdown | FTAG PHO | -10.38%-7.48% | -10.38%-13.83% | -16.31%-19.26% | -32.15%-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTAG PHO | 42d68d | 42d360d | 228d250d | 1595d715d |
Trading data
FTAG | PHO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.60 | $70.06 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $28.75 | $70.18 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTAG | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FTAG | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.60 | $70.06 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.17% |
| AuM | $14.04 M | $1.95 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
FTAG | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Indxx Global Agriculture Index | NASDAQ OMX US Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 40 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 11, 2010 | December 6, 2005 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FTAG
USA
35.61%
Germany
22.15%
India
9.39%
Japan
8.44%
Other
24.41%
PHO
USA
95.58%
Other
4.42%
Sectors
FTAG
Non-Energy Materi.
52.48%
Industrials
24.46%
Healthcare
9.55%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Other
5.25%
PHO
Industrials
44.74%
Healthcare
17.72%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.33%
Technology
14.97%
Utilities
7.24%
Other
0%
Advertisement
Diversification
FTAG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
76.03%
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.12%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FTAG
Deere & Co.
10.44%
Corteva, Inc.
10.06%
Bayer AG
9.55%
BASF SE
9.43%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.74%
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
4.43%
Kubota Corp.
4.04%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
3.94%
Bunge Global SA
3.87%
Wilmar International Ltd.
3.58%
Industries of Qatar Co.
3.14%
CNH Industrial NV
2.93%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.18%
Evonik Industries AG
1.93%
The Toro Co.
1.77%
PHO
Roper Technologies, Inc.
9.56%
Ecolab, Inc.
8.22%
Waters Corp.
7.31%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
6.67%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
6.13%
Veralto Corp.
4.40%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
4.28%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.08%
Xylem, Inc.
3.79%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.64%
IDEX Corp.
3.62%
Trimble, Inc.
3.06%
Pentair plc
2.91%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
2.77%
AECOM
2.66%
Frequently asked questions about FTAG and PHO
How have the FTAG and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, FTAG is up 10.35% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has returned 0.03%. That puts FTAG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTAG or PHO?
Year-to-date, the FTAG ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to -$130M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTAG or PHO?
Over the past year, FTAG had a volatility of 13.49%, while PHO experienced 15.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTAG or PHO?
As of October 15, 2026, FTAG holds $14.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $1.95 B.
What sectors do the FTAG and PHO ETFs invest in?
FTAG leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the FTAG ETF and PHO ETF?
FTAG top holdings include Deere & Co., Corteva, Inc. and Bayer AG. PHO holds in its top three: Roper Technologies, Inc., Ecolab, Inc. and Waters Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FTAG or PHO?
FTAG holds 50 securities with 76.03% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.12%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FTAG & PHO
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
PHO
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
