Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FSTAvsPBJETF Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Staples. FSTA's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Staples and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, PBJ's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples and Materials. FSTA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.61% for PBJ. FSTA is up 10.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. PBJ performs worse with 8.69% YTD performance, and -$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FSTA and PBJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FSTA vs PBJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FSTA PBJ | -1.18%-2.86% | +10.18%+8.03% | +10.40%+8.69% | +7.74%+9.92% | +35.72%+15.17% | +51.77%+30.46% |
| Flows | FSTA PBJ | +$17M-$13M | +$20M-$16M | +$12M-$14M | +$85M-$12M | +$79M-$239M | +$328M+$6M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FSTA PBJ | +13.59%+12.19% | +13.89%+14.46% | +11.68%+12.63% | +12.95%+13.72% |
| Max drawdown | FSTA PBJ | -4.97%-4.72% | -7.86%-12.44% | -11.78%-14.70% | -16.55%-15.63% |
| Max drawdown duration | FSTA PBJ | 9d10d | 146d194d | 205d297d | 685d692d |
FSTA | PBJ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $53.71 | $48.65 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $54.33 | $48.48 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FSTA | PBJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FSTA | PBJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.71 | $48.65 |
| 1D performance | -1.14% | +0.35% |
| AuM | $1.46 B | $88.63 M |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.61% |
FSTA | PBJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | Invesco |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples 25/50 Index | Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index |
| N° of holdings | 90 | 28 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 21, 2013 | June 23, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FSTA and PBJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FSTA is up 10.4% year-to-date (YTD), while PBJ has returned 8.69%. That puts FSTA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FSTA or PBJ?
Year-to-date, the FSTA ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to -$14M for PBJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: FSTA or PBJ?
Over the past year, FSTA had a volatility of 13.89%, while PBJ experienced 14.46%.
Which ETF is bigger: FSTA or PBJ?
As of March 10, 2026, FSTA holds $1.46 B in assets under management (AUM), while PBJ manages $88.63 M.
What sectors do the FSTA and PBJ ETFs invest in?
FSTA leans toward sectors like Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, PBJ focuses on Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the FSTA ETF and PBJ ETF?
FSTA top holdings include WALMART INC, COSTCO WHOLESALE and PROCTERGAMBLE. PBJ holds in its top three: MONSTER BEVERAGE, CORTEVA INC and HERSHEY FOODS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FSTA or PBJ?
FSTA holds 93 securities with 71.43% of its assets in the top 15. PBJ has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.97%.
Can You Bet on Soaring Cocoa Prices with ETFs? Kind Of – Here's How
Analyzing the Potential ETF Winners & Losers from The Weight-Loss Drug Craze
3 food and beverage ETFs for hungry investors
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
