FRNWvsTANETF Comparison
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Utilities and Technology. FRNW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.7% for TAN. FRNW is up 8.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$59M in YTD flows. TAN performs worse with -4.47% YTD performance, and +$133M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FRNW and TAN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FRNW vs TAN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FRNW TAN | -3.46%-8.38% | -19.06%-33.93% | +8.64%-4.47% | +26.90%+14.39% | +28.33%-18.88% | n/a-45.20% |
| Flows | FRNW TAN | --$263M | -$38M-$488M | +$59M+$133M | +$65M+$271M | +$63M-$60M | --$567M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FRNW TAN | +26.26%+39.90% | +24.34%+35.09% | +25.18%+36.25% | n/a+36.25% |
| Max drawdown | FRNW TAN | -22.22%-35.02% | -22.22%-36.40% | -32.42%-54.61% | n/a-73.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | FRNW TAN | 91d91d | 91d93d | 688d886d | n/a1765d |
FRNW | TAN | |
Last sale 9/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.85 | $47.32 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $21.87 | $46.86 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FRNW | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FRNW | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.85 | $47.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.09% | +0.98% |
| AuM | $96.36 M | $1.01 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.7% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15