FNGSvsQGRWETF Comparison
VS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) belongs to the Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity segment. WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FNGS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Business Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, QGRW's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. FNGS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.28% for QGRW. FNGS is up 15.2% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. QGRW performs worse with 12.52% YTD performance, and +$813M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FNGS and QGRW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FNGS vs QGRW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FNGS QGRW | -5.90%-3.74% | +5.61%+3.36% | +15.20%+12.52% | +12.55%+13.68% | +144.06%+109.87% | +137.47%n/a |
| Flows | FNGS QGRW | -+$156M | -+$436M | -+$813M | -+$1.02B | +$153M+$2.47B | +$206M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FNGS QGRW | +21.52%+17.95% | +22.92%+19.81% | +25.44%+21.55% | +30.35%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FNGS QGRW | -7.09%-6.80% | -22.94%-15.46% | -26.06%-24.44% | -48.88%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FNGS QGRW | 15d17d | 190d169d | 105d191d | 617dn/a |
Trading data
FNGS | QGRW | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $78.28 | $65.97 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $78.50 | $66.22 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FNGS | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FNGS | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $78.28 | $65.97 |
| 1D performance | -0.28% | -0.38% |
| AuM | $588.65 M | $3.20 B |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.28% |
Characteristics
FNGS | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | BMO | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | NYSE FANG+ Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 10 | 100 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 21, 2019 | December 15, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FNGS
USA
99.5%
Other
0.5%
QGRW
USA
98.37%
Other
1.63%
Sectors
FNGS
Technology
76.39%
Business Services
13.08%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.03%
Other
0.5%
QGRW
Technology
63.52%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.11%
Industrials
8.27%
Other
19.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
FNGS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10
99.5%
QGRW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.79%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FNGS
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
13.08%
Microsoft Corp.
12.25%
Amazon.com, Inc.
10.03%
NVIDIA Corp.
9.88%
Apple, Inc.
9.82%
Netflix, Inc.
9.66%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
9.22%
Broadcom Inc.
8.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
8.55%
Micron Technology, Inc.
8.37%
QGRW
NVIDIA Corp.
11.83%
Microsoft Corp.
9.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
7.65%
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.61%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.28%
Apple, Inc.
3.04%
Broadcom Inc.
2.97%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.53%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.14%
Visa, Inc.
2.04%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.76%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
1.62%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.31%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.29%
Frequently asked questions about FNGS and QGRW
How have the FNGS and QGRW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 22, 2026, FNGS is up 15.2% year-to-date (YTD), while QGRW has returned 12.52%. That puts FNGS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FNGS or QGRW?
Year-to-date, the FNGS ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$813M for QGRW.
Which ETF is more volatile: FNGS or QGRW?
Over the past year, FNGS had a volatility of 22.92%, while QGRW experienced 19.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: FNGS or QGRW?
As of October 22, 2026, FNGS holds $588.65 M in assets under management (AUM), while QGRW manages $3.20 B.
What sectors do the FNGS and QGRW ETFs invest in?
FNGS leans toward sectors like Technology, Business Services and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, QGRW focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FNGS ETF and QGRW ETF?
FNGS top holdings include Palantir Technologies, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Amazon.com, Inc.. QGRW holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FNGS or QGRW?
FNGS has 10 securities. QGRW has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.79%.
Latest news about FNGS & QGRW
The ETF Show - Spotlight on Equity Market
June 18, 2025
QGRW
Finetuning Value and Growth ETF Allocations Beyond the Russell 1000 Index
December 23, 2024
QGRW
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: August 2024
August 29, 2024
QGRW
Advertisement
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
July 29, 2024
QGRW
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
July 29, 2024
QGRW
Two Ways to Invest in Quality with WisdomTree ETFs
May 16, 2024
QGRW
What’s Driving the Market, a Look at US Equities
June 14, 2023
FNGS
Advertisement
