FMAYvsQQQIETF Comparison
VS
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. FMAY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. FMAY is up 8.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$326M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$7.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FMAY and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FMAY vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FMAY QQQI | +1.64%+0.65% | +2.25%+1.01% | +8.37%+10.72% | +11.01%+14.06% | +49.02%n/a | +55.50%n/a |
| Flows | FMAY QQQI | -$4M+$447M | +$31M+$2.14B | +$326M+$7.55B | +$363M+$9.46B | +$627M- | +$984M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FMAY QQQI | +7.03%+16.13% | +7.07%+16.85% | +9.48%n/a | +11.07%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FMAY QQQI | -2.10%-6.64% | -4.34%-9.62% | -12.87%n/a | -13.54%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FMAY QQQI | 16d13d | 41d76d | 106dn/a | 442dn/a |
Trading data
FMAY | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $57.41 | $53.62 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $57.83 | $54.90 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FMAY | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $57.41 | $53.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.73% | -2.33% |
| AuM | $1.48 B | $14.89 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
FMAY | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 15, 2020 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
FMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FMAY and QQQI
How have the FMAY and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, FMAY is up 8.37% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has returned 10.72%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FMAY or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the FMAY ETF saw +$326M in flows, compared to +$7.55B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: FMAY or QQQI?
Over the past year, FMAY had a volatility of 7.07%, while QQQI experienced 16.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: FMAY or QQQI?
As of October 15, 2026, FMAY holds $1.48 B in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $14.89 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about FMAY & QQQI
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
QQQI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
QQQI
Advertisement
Advertisement
