FMARvsQQQIETF Comparison
VS
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (FMAR) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. FMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. FMAR is up 13.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$113M in YTD flows. QQQI performs worse with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$7.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FMAR and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FMAR vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FMAR QQQI | +1.26%+0.65% | +2.53%+1.01% | +13.67%+10.72% | +16.35%+14.06% | +51.07%n/a | +66.28%n/a |
| Flows | FMAR QQQI | +$12M+$447M | +$48M+$2.14B | +$113M+$7.55B | +$152M+$9.46B | +$518M- | +$737M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FMAR QQQI | +3.81%+16.13% | +5.08%+16.85% | +8.97%n/a | +10.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FMAR QQQI | -1.03%-6.64% | -2.45%-9.62% | -12.69%n/a | -14.34%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FMAR QQQI | 15d13d | 7d76d | 126dn/a | 414dn/a |
Trading data
FMAR | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $53.73 | $53.62 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $53.93 | $54.90 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FMAR | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.73 | $53.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -2.33% |
| AuM | $1.21 B | $14.89 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
FMAR | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 22, 2020 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
FMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FMAR and QQQI
How have the FMAR and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, FMAR is up 13.67% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has returned 10.72%. That puts FMAR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FMAR or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the FMAR ETF saw +$113M in flows, compared to +$7.55B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: FMAR or QQQI?
Over the past year, FMAR had a volatility of 5.08%, while QQQI experienced 16.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: FMAR or QQQI?
As of October 15, 2026, FMAR holds $1.21 B in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $14.89 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about FMAR & QQQI
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
QQQI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
QQQI
