FLOWvsSMOTETF Comparison
VS
Global X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF (FLOW) and VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FLOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Energy. In contrast, SMOT's top sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. FLOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.5% for SMOT. FLOW is up 2.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. SMOT performs better with 2.22% YTD performance, and -$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLOW and SMOT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLOW vs SMOT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLOW SMOT | +3.86%+5.96% | +0.22%-1.71% | +2.15%+2.22% | +28.33%+18.88% | n/a+36.52% | n/an/a |
| Flows | FLOW SMOT | -$49K-$16M | -$2M-$32M | -$6M-$40M | +$13M-$75M | -+$219M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLOW SMOT | +14.78%+14.97% | +15.97%+15.03% | n/a+17.65% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FLOW SMOT | -6.59%-8.69% | -6.59%-8.93% | n/a-23.35% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FLOW SMOT | 73d88d | 73d92d | n/a380d | n/an/a |
Trading data
FLOW | SMOT | |
Last sale 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.61 | $37.03 |
| Previous close 04/24/2026 | $36.73 | $37.00 |
| Consolidated volume 04/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLOW | SMOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLOW | SMOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.61 | $37.03 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | +0.07% |
| AuM | $26.69 M | $324.80 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
FLOW | SMOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Global X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 Index | Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus Index |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 111 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 10, 2023 | October 4, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLOW
USA
95.09%
Other
4.91%
SMOT
USA
90.51%
Other
9.49%
Sectors
FLOW
Information Techn.
18.87%
Consumer Discreti.
18.24%
Energy
13.47%
Consumer Staples
10.4%
Health Care
10.15%
Industrials
8.27%
Other
20.59%
SMOT
Health Care
16.84%
Information Techn.
16.57%
Industrials
15.26%
Materials
10.83%
Consumer Discreti.
9.27%
Consumer Staples
8.52%
Other
22.71%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.17%
SMOT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
FLOW
APA CORPORATION
3.20%
DEVON ENERGY
3.02%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY
2.82%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS
2.78%
ARCHER DANIELS
2.56%
ALTRIA GROUP
2.42%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
2.31%
BIOGEN INC
2.23%
OVINTIV INC
2.22%
CARDINAL HEALTH
2.13%
COMCAST
2.03%
AIRBNB
1.91%
THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY
1.89%
D R HORTON
1.89%
FORD MOTOR
1.75%
SMOT
DEVON ENERGY
1.75%
SCHLUMBERGER
1.69%
ALBEMARLE
1.65%
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES
1.63%
CORTEVA INC
1.60%
ROYALTY PHARMA
1.53%
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC
1.44%
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC
1.44%
BIOGEN INC
1.40%
CIGNA
1.35%
BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL
1.34%
AIRBNB
1.33%
ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS INC
1.33%
ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS INC
1.32%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS
1.31%
Frequently asked questions about FLOW and SMOT
How have the FLOW and SMOT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, FLOW is up 2.15% year-to-date (YTD), while SMOT has returned 2.22%. That puts SMOT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLOW or SMOT?
Year-to-date, the FLOW ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to -$40M for SMOT.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLOW or SMOT?
Over the past year, FLOW had a volatility of 15.97%, while SMOT experienced 15.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLOW or SMOT?
As of April 24, 2026, FLOW holds $26.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMOT manages $324.80 M.
What sectors do the FLOW and SMOT ETFs invest in?
FLOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Energy. Meanwhile, SMOT focuses on Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FLOW ETF and SMOT ETF?
FLOW top holdings include APA CORPORATION, DEVON ENERGY and DIAMONDBACK ENERGY. SMOT holds in its top three: DEVON ENERGY, SCHLUMBERGER and ALBEMARLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: FLOW or SMOT?
FLOW holds 99 securities with 35.17% of its assets in the top 15. SMOT has 114 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.1%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLOW & SMOT
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
October 10, 2024
FLOW
Global X Launches New ETF Focused on Free Cash Flow
August 15, 2023
FLOW
Advertisement
Advertisement
