FFOGvsQGRWETF Comparison
VS
Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FFOG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. In contrast, QGRW's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. FFOG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.28% for QGRW. FFOG is up 4.19% year-to-date (YTD) with +$142M in YTD flows. QGRW performs better with 14.55% YTD performance, and +$789M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FFOG and QGRW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FFOG vs QGRW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FFOG QGRW | -1.04%+1.62% | -0.37%+2.60% | +4.19%+14.55% | +4.23%+17.95% | n/a+105.20% | n/an/a |
| Flows | FFOG QGRW | +$18M+$224M | +$61M+$491M | +$142M+$789M | +$166M+$1.01B | -+$2.45B | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FFOG QGRW | +22.49%+17.51% | +24.03%+19.62% | n/a+21.52% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FFOG QGRW | -8.97%-5.45% | -21.83%-15.46% | n/a-24.44% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FFOG QGRW | 13d15d | 188d169d | n/a191d | n/an/a |
Trading data
FFOG | QGRW | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.73 | $67.20 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $50.08 | $68.80 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FFOG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFFOG | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FFOG | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.73 | $67.20 |
| 1D performance | -2.70% | -2.33% |
| AuM | $362.80 M | $3.23 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.28% |
Characteristics
FFOG | QGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | - | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 100 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 6, 2023 | December 15, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FFOG
USA
83.19%
Other
16.81%
QGRW
USA
98.37%
Other
1.63%
Sectors
FFOG
Technology
68.17%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.07%
Healthcare
8.71%
Other
13.05%
QGRW
Technology
63.52%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.11%
Industrials
8.27%
Other
19.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
FFOG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
69.07%
QGRW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.79%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FFOG
NVIDIA Corp.
9.83%
Amazon.com, Inc.
9.59%
Alphabet, Inc.
8.64%
Apple, Inc.
5.63%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.28%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.12%
Microsoft Corp.
4.08%
Broadcom Inc.
3.77%
Sandisk Corp.
3.72%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.09%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.97%
Lam Research Corp.
2.40%
ASML Holding NV
2.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.30%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.26%
QGRW
NVIDIA Corp.
11.83%
Microsoft Corp.
9.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
7.65%
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.61%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.28%
Apple, Inc.
3.04%
Broadcom Inc.
2.97%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.53%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.14%
Visa, Inc.
2.04%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.76%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
1.62%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.31%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.29%
Frequently asked questions about FFOG and QGRW
How have the FFOG and QGRW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, FFOG is up 4.19% year-to-date (YTD), while QGRW has returned 14.55%. That puts QGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FFOG or QGRW?
Year-to-date, the FFOG ETF saw +$142M in flows, compared to +$789M for QGRW.
Which ETF is more volatile: FFOG or QGRW?
Over the past year, FFOG had a volatility of 24.03%, while QGRW experienced 19.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: FFOG or QGRW?
As of October 16, 2026, FFOG holds $362.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while QGRW manages $3.23 B.
What sectors do the FFOG and QGRW ETFs invest in?
FFOG leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. Meanwhile, QGRW focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FFOG ETF and QGRW ETF?
FFOG top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Amazon.com, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc.. QGRW holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FFOG or QGRW?
FFOG holds 42 securities with 69.07% of its assets in the top 15. QGRW has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.79%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FFOG & QGRW
The ETF Show - Spotlight on Equity Market
June 18, 2025
QGRW
Finetuning Value and Growth ETF Allocations Beyond the Russell 1000 Index
December 23, 2024
QGRW
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: August 2024
August 29, 2024
QGRW
Advertisement
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
July 29, 2024
QGRW
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
July 29, 2024
QGRW
Two Ways to Invest in Quality with WisdomTree ETFs
May 16, 2024
QGRW
Advertisement
