FFLSvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.73%
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. FFLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.05%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. FFLS is up 0.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 12.06% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FFLS and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FFLS vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FFLS QDPL | +2.42%+1.34% | +1.09%+1.65% | +0.39%+12.06% | +1.48%+15.84% | +31.66%+73.85% | n/a+75.18% |
| Flows | FFLS QDPL | +$468K+$35M | +$2M+$119M | +$7M+$300M | +$8M+$420M | +$43M+$1.37B | -+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FFLS QDPL | +12.50%+10.24% | +10.67%+11.68% | +11.09%+13.54% | n/a+15.34% |
| Max drawdown | FFLS QDPL | -5.80%-2.82% | -9.76%-8.32% | -11.13%-17.47% | n/a-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | FFLS QDPL | 65d53d | 210d70d | 394d126d | n/a704d |
Trading data
FFLS | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.14 | $45.95 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $23.30 | $46.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FFLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFFLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FFLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.14 | $45.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $45.65 M | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 2.05% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
FFLS | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Future Fund ETF | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 21, 2023 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FFLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FFLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
FFLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FFLS
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FFLS and QDPL
How have the FFLS and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, FFLS is up 0.39% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.06%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FFLS or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the FFLS ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: FFLS or QDPL?
Over the past year, FFLS had a volatility of 10.67%, while QDPL experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: FFLS or QDPL?
As of October 15, 2026, FFLS holds $45.65 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about FFLS & QDPL
Advertisement
