FEDMvsEFAETF Comparison
ETF 1
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.35%
VS
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. FEDM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, EFA's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. FEDM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%, versus 0.32% for EFA. FEDM is up 7.59% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. EFA performs better with 9.68% YTD performance, and +$1.17B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FEDM and EFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FEDM vs EFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEDM EFA | +4.07%+2.48% | +7.99%+7.01% | +7.59%+9.68% | +19.09%+23.38% | +49.86%+56.94% | n/a+51.51% |
| Flows | FEDM EFA | -+$814M | -$3M+$814M | -$2M+$1.17B | +$11M+$3.20B | +$19M+$5.03B | -+$3.15B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FEDM EFA | +16.90%+21.07% | +13.18%+15.65% | +13.57%+15.02% | n/a+16.29% |
| Max drawdown | FEDM EFA | -3.82%-4.85% | -10.69%-11.39% | -14.86%-13.68% | n/a-29.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | FEDM EFA | 54d14d | 107d107d | 214d41d | n/a892d |
Trading data
FEDM | EFA | |
Last sale 6/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $62.94 | $103.78 |
| Previous close 06/17/2026 | $63.40 | $104.31 |
| Consolidated volume 06/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FEDM | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FEDM | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.94 | $103.78 |
| 1D performance | -0.72% | -0.51% |
| AuM | $78.10 M | $77.19 B |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
FEDM | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 207 | 651 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 21, 2021 | August 14, 2001 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FEDM
Japan
18.71%
United Kingdom
13.51%
Canada
11.7%
France
8.67%
Germany
8.41%
Other
39.01%
EFA
Japan
22.87%
United Kingdom
14.37%
Switzerland
9.29%
France
9.1%
Germany
9.01%
Other
35.36%
Sectors
FEDM
Financials
26.31%
Industrials
18.1%
Health Care
9.28%
Information Techn.
8.76%
Other
37.54%
EFA
Financials
23.79%
Industrials
18.78%
Information Techn.
9.44%
Consumer Discreti.
8.17%
Health Care
7.39%
Other
32.43%
Advertisement
Diversification
FEDM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.15%
EFA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
FEDM
ASML HOLDING
2.48%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.80%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
1.62%
SHELL PLC
1.60%
SIEMENS
1.54%
ASTRAZENECA
1.53%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
1.49%
NOVARTIS
1.47%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
1.30%
SIEMENS ENERGY AG
1.29%
ENBRIDGE
1.27%
HITACHI
1.27%
SAP SE
1.17%
NESTLE SA
1.16%
ZURICH INSURANCE
1.16%
EFA
ASML HOLDING
2.58%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.46%
ASTRAZENECA
1.36%
CH1499059983
1.32%
NOVARTIS
1.30%
NESTLE SA
1.21%
SHELL PLC
1.19%
SIEMENS
1.04%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.97%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.94%
BHP GROUP LTD
0.91%
TOTALENERGIES SE
0.85%
TOYOTA
0.85%
BANCO SANTANDER SA
0.83%
SAP SE
0.82%
Frequently asked questions about FEDM and EFA
How have the FEDM and EFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 17, 2026, FEDM is up 7.59% year-to-date (YTD), while EFA has returned 9.68%. That puts EFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FEDM or EFA?
Year-to-date, the FEDM ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$1.17B for EFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: FEDM or EFA?
Over the past year, FEDM had a volatility of 13.18%, while EFA experienced 15.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: FEDM or EFA?
As of June 17, 2026, FEDM holds $78.10 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFA manages $77.19 B.
What sectors do the FEDM and EFA ETFs invest in?
FEDM leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, EFA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FEDM ETF and EFA ETF?
FEDM top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROYAL BK CANADA and COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA. EFA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, HSBC HOLDINGS and ASTRAZENECA.
Which ETF is more diversified: FEDM or EFA?
FEDM holds 211 securities with 22.15% of its assets in the top 15. EFA has 691 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.62%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FEDM & EFA
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
January 14, 2026
EFA
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
December 23, 2025
EFA
Advertisement
Advertisement
