Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FEDMvsEFAETF Comparison
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Health Care. FEDM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%, versus 0.32% for EFA. FEDM is up 1.41% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. EFA performs better with 3.25% YTD performance, and +$354M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FEDM and EFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FEDM vs EFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEDM EFA | -4.79%-5.54% | +3.71%+3.98% | +1.41%+3.25% | +20.40%+24.83% | +48.50%+59.71% | n/a+52.31% |
| Flows | FEDM EFA | -- | +$2M+$1.20B | +$2M+$354M | +$16M+$3.17B | +$25M+$4.95B | -+$2.48B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FEDM EFA | +13.68%+14.66% | +15.02%+16.27% | +13.18%+14.20% | n/a+15.75% |
| Max drawdown | FEDM EFA | -7.61%-6.80% | -12.85%-13.68% | -14.86%-13.68% | n/a-29.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | FEDM EFA | 9d14d | 38d41d | 214d41d | n/a892d |
FEDM | EFA | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.88 | $99.01 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $60.18 | $99.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FEDM | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FEDM | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.88 | $99.01 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -0.21% |
| AuM | $76.83 M | $73.04 B |
| E/R | 0.14% | 0.32% |
FEDM | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 211 | 657 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 21, 2021 | August 14, 2001 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FEDM and EFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FEDM is up 1.41% year-to-date (YTD), while EFA has returned 3.25%. That puts EFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FEDM or EFA?
Year-to-date, the FEDM ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$354M for EFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: FEDM or EFA?
Over the past year, FEDM had a volatility of 15.02%, while EFA experienced 16.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: FEDM or EFA?
As of March 10, 2026, FEDM holds $76.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFA manages $73.04 B.
What sectors do the FEDM and EFA ETFs invest in?
FEDM leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, EFA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FEDM ETF and EFA ETF?
FEDM top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROYAL BK CANADA and SIEMENS. EFA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FEDM or EFA?
FEDM holds 220 securities with 21.78% of its assets in the top 15. EFA has 695 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.62%.
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
