FEBWvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF (FEBW) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. FEBW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.74%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. FEBW is up 7.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$89M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 13.56% YTD performance, and -$166M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FEBW and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FEBW vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEBW QYLD | +1.12%+1.24% | +2.15%+4.86% | +7.64%+13.56% | +10.24%+20.25% | +37.84%+52.89% | n/a+49.30% |
| Flows | FEBW QYLD | +$2M+$42M | +$17K+$58M | +$89M-$166M | +$83M-$263M | +$118M+$85M | -+$4.84B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FEBW QYLD | +3.27%+9.78% | +4.64%+11.16% | +6.04%+13.51% | n/a+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | FEBW QYLD | -0.91%-3.58% | -3.73%-5.84% | -8.53%-19.06% | n/a-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | FEBW QYLD | 16d10d | 44d39d | 110d239d | n/a771d |
Trading data
FEBW | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.32 | |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $18.74 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FEBW
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFEBW | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FEBW | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $18.32 |
| 1D performance | – | -2.24% |
| AuM | $201.85 M | $8.38 B |
| E/R | 0.74% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
FEBW | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Allianz Investment Management LLC | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE Nasdaq 100 BuyWrite V2 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | December 11, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FEBW
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FEBW
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Diversification
FEBW
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FEBW
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FEBW and QYLD
How have the FEBW and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, FEBW is up 7.64% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 13.56%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FEBW or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the FEBW ETF saw +$89M in flows, compared to -$166M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: FEBW or QYLD?
Over the past year, FEBW had a volatility of 4.64%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: FEBW or QYLD?
As of October 15, 2026, FEBW holds $201.85 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.38 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about FEBW & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
