FEBTvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. FEBT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.74%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. FEBT is up 10.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$49M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 14.32% YTD performance, and -$150M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FEBT and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FEBT vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEBT QYLD | +1.28%-0.15% | +2.30%+6.67% | +10.87%+14.32% | +14.81%+19.41% | +58.57%+57.06% | n/a+49.90% |
| Flows | FEBT QYLD | -+$26M | -$1M+$68M | +$49M-$150M | +$44M-$239M | +$96M+$111M | -+$4.85B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FEBT QYLD | +5.94%+9.60% | +7.66%+11.16% | +9.47%+13.51% | n/a+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | FEBT QYLD | -1.48%-3.58% | -6.00%-5.84% | -13.02%-19.06% | n/a-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | FEBT QYLD | 15d10d | 70d39d | 124d239d | n/a771d |
Trading data
FEBT | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.28 | |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $18.29 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FEBT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFEBT | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FEBT | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $18.28 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.05% |
| AuM | $161.69 M | $8.37 B |
| E/R | 0.74% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
FEBT | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Allianz Investment Management LLC | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE Nasdaq 100 BuyWrite V2 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | December 11, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FEBT
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FEBT
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
FEBT
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FEBT
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FEBT and QYLD
How have the FEBT and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, FEBT is up 10.87% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 14.32%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FEBT or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the FEBT ETF saw +$49M in flows, compared to -$150M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: FEBT or QYLD?
Over the past year, FEBT had a volatility of 7.66%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: FEBT or QYLD?
As of October 16, 2026, FEBT holds $161.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.37 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about FEBT & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
