EWSvsDBEFETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EWS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, DBEF's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. EWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.35% for DBEF. EWS is up 17.21% year-to-date (YTD) with +$169M in YTD flows. DBEF performs worse with 13.39% YTD performance, and -$133M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWS and DBEF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EWS vs DBEF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWS DBEF | +7.16%+1.26% | +12.38%+6.80% | +17.21%+13.39% | +20.24%+24.57% | +88.83%+66.18% | +74.57%+89.95% |
| Flows | EWS DBEF | +$42M+$54M | +$136M+$55M | +$169M-$133M | +$91M-$556M | +$182M+$1.86B | +$151M+$2.31B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWS DBEF | +13.08%+10.09% | +13.14%+10.98% | +14.36%+11.81% | +15.53%+11.99% |
| Max drawdown | EWS DBEF | -4.12%-2.23% | -7.18%-9.03% | -14.93%-14.53% | -28.60%-14.56% |
| Max drawdown duration | EWS DBEF | 13d18d | 90d81d | 54d73d | 1033d385d |
Trading data
EWS | DBEF | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.65 | $54.68 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $31.44 | $54.41 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EWS | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EWS | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.65 | $54.68 |
| 1D performance | +0.67% | +0.50% |
| AuM | $1.03 B | $9.13 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
EWS | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI Singapore 25/50 Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 17 | 818 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EWS
Singapore
95.86%
Other
4.14%
DBEF
Japan
23.1%
United Kingdom
13.15%
Switzerland
10.02%
France
8.64%
Germany
8.41%
Other
36.68%
Sectors
EWS
Finance
60.93%
Industrials
12.75%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.73%
Utilities
8.68%
Other
8.91%
DBEF
Finance
26.04%
Industrials
15.54%
Technology
13.43%
Healthcare
9.72%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.95%
Other
27.32%
Advertisement
Diversification
EWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
98.36%
DBEF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
EWS
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
22.76%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
20.19%
Singapore Airlines Ltd.
4.94%
Singapore Exchange Ltd.
4.80%
Sea Ltd. (Singapore)
4.78%
Grab Holdings Ltd. (Singapore)
4.69%
Keppel Ltd.
4.62%
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
4.55%
CapitaLand Ascendas REIT
4.32%
Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
4.07%
Sembcorp Industries Ltd.
4.07%
Wilmar International Ltd.
3.96%
Singapore Telecommunications Ltd.
3.82%
Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) Ltd.
3.75%
CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust
3.08%
DBEF
ASML Holding NV
3.12%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.47%
Roche Holding AG
1.32%
Novartis AG
1.29%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.26%
Nestlé SA
1.21%
Siemens AG
1.04%
Shell Plc
0.99%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.96%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.95%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
0.88%
Banco Santander SA
0.88%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
0.87%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
0.82%
Schneider Electric SE
0.80%
Frequently asked questions about EWS and DBEF
How have the EWS and DBEF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, EWS is up 17.21% year-to-date (YTD), while DBEF has returned 13.39%. That puts EWS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWS or DBEF?
Year-to-date, the EWS ETF saw +$169M in flows, compared to -$133M for DBEF.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWS or DBEF?
Over the past year, EWS had a volatility of 13.14%, while DBEF experienced 10.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWS or DBEF?
As of July 24, 2026, EWS holds $1.03 B in assets under management (AUM), while DBEF manages $9.13 B.
What sectors do the EWS and DBEF ETFs invest in?
EWS leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, DBEF focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the EWS ETF and DBEF ETF?
EWS top holdings include DBS Group Holdings Ltd., Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd. and Singapore Airlines Ltd.. DBEF holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EWS or DBEF?
EWS holds 17 securities with 98.36% of its assets in the top 15. DBEF has 834 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.88%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EWS & DBEF
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
January 14, 2026
DBEF
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
December 23, 2025
DBEF
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
June 26, 2024
DBEF
Advertisement
Advertisement
