Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EQLTvsEEMETF Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. EQLT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.72% for EEM. EQLT is up 4.4% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. EEM performs better with 4.68% YTD performance, and +$5.85B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EQLT and EEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EQLT vs EEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EQLT EEM | -4.99%-5.68% | +6.75%+6.95% | +4.40%+4.68% | +35.07%+33.53% | n/a+62.22% | n/a+19.05% |
| Flows | EQLT EEM | -+$1.58B | -+$6.13B | -+$5.85B | -+$6.22B | --$3.82B | -+$957M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EQLT EEM | +20.34%+19.63% | +16.71%+16.71% | n/a+14.83% | n/a+16.30% |
| Max drawdown | EQLT EEM | -8.56%-9.26% | -13.07%-13.74% | n/a-15.99% | n/a-37.62% |
| Max drawdown duration | EQLT EEM | 15d15d | 43d51d | n/a218d | n/a1542d |
EQLT | EEM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:59 PM | $31.85 | $57.05 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $32.81 | $56.95 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EQLT | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EQLT | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.85 | $57.05 |
| 1D performance | -2.92% | +0.18% |
| AuM | $10.15 M | $27.71 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.72% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EQLT and EEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, EQLT is up 4.4% year-to-date (YTD), while EEM has returned 4.68%. That puts EEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EQLT or EEM?
Year-to-date, the EQLT ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$5.85B for EEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: EQLT or EEM?
Over the past year, EQLT had a volatility of 16.71%, while EEM experienced 16.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: EQLT or EEM?
As of March 12, 2026, EQLT holds $10.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while EEM manages $27.71 B.
What sectors do the EQLT and EEM ETFs invest in?
EQLT leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, EEM focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EQLT ETF and EEM ETF?
EQLT top holdings include SAMSUNG ELECTR, SK HYNIX and ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD. EEM holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and TENCENT HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: EQLT or EEM?
EQLT holds 313 securities with 42.73% of its assets in the top 15. EEM has 1199 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.51%.
There's an ETF For That? Emerging Markets, Ex-China
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
How to Hedge Your Portfolio Against Geopolitical Risk with ETFs
There's an ETF for that? The Top 3 ETFs for Investing in India
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
