EOCTvsQQQIETF Comparison
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. EOCT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. EOCT is up 7.99% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$7.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EOCT and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EOCT vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EOCT QQQI | -2.95%+0.65% | +0.64%+1.01% | +7.99%+10.72% | +11.05%+14.06% | +51.80%n/a | +34.38%n/a |
| Flows | EOCT QQQI | +$20M+$447M | +$20M+$2.14B | -$10M+$7.55B | +$12M+$9.46B | +$54M- | +$90M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EOCT QQQI | +6.26%+16.13% | +8.85%+16.85% | +10.81%n/a | +11.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown | EOCT QQQI | -4.77%-6.64% | -6.33%-9.62% | -8.57%n/a | -20.48%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EOCT QQQI | 11d13d | 50d76d | 215dn/a | 994dn/a |
EOCT | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.29 | $53.62 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $34.54 | $54.90 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
EOCT | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.29 | $53.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.72% | -2.33% |
| AuM | $124.54 M | $14.89 B |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.68% |
EOCT | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 1, 2021 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |