EMETvsCOPPETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Copper and Electrification ETF (EMET) belongs to the Natural Resources segment. Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. EMET's top 1 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, COPP's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Finance and Non-Corporate. EMET is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.65% for COPP. EMET is up 17.53% year-to-date (YTD) with +$752K in YTD flows. COPP performs better with 32.17% YTD performance, and +$158M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EMET and COPP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EMET vs COPP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EMET COPP | -1.94%+5.68% | +6.94%+15.58% | +17.53%+32.17% | +58.29%+86.44% | +81.14%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | EMET COPP | --$5M | -$4M-$32M | +$752K+$158M | +$3M+$203M | -$2M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EMET COPP | +39.72%+42.80% | +38.65%+42.07% | +32.14%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | EMET COPP | -19.70%-17.78% | -24.48%-27.60% | -39.33%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | EMET COPP | 65d65d | 193d96d | 478dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
EMET | COPP | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.88 | |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $42.80 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EMET | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EMET | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $42.88 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.19% |
| AuM | $37.02 M | $307.92 M |
| E/R | 0.62% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
EMET | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index | Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 245 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 11, 2021 | March 5, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Exposure
Countries
EMET
Canada
20.37%
USA
16.46%
United Kingdom
14.48%
China
13.51%
South Africa
7.83%
Mexico
7.7%
Other
19.64%
COPP
Canada
36.68%
USA
31%
United Kingdom
9.12%
Other
23.2%
Sectors
EMET
Non-Energy Materi.
100%
Other
-0%
COPP
Non-Energy Materi.
93.88%
Other
6.12%
Advertisement
Diversification
EMET
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.83%
COPP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
86.4%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EMET
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
8.37%
Anglo American Plc
8.36%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
7.70%
Teck Resources Limited
6.94%
Antofagasta Plc
5.15%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.07%
Lundin Mining Corp.
3.56%
Valterra Platinum Ltd.
3.37%
Boliden AB
3.36%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.12%
Albemarle Corp.
2.68%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd.
2.48%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
2.47%
Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
2.19%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
2.03%
COPP
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
25.17%
Teck Resources Limited
10.02%
Antofagasta Plc
8.95%
Southern Copper Corp.
4.99%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA
4.94%
CA85210C1005
4.89%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
4.70%
Lundin Mining Corp.
4.33%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
4.08%
Capstone Copper Corp.
3.40%
Sandfire Resources Ltd.
2.55%
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
2.45%
MMG Ltd.
2.29%
PT Amman Mineral Internasional Tbk
2.29%
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
1.36%
Frequently asked questions about EMET and COPP
How have the EMET and COPP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, EMET is up 17.53% year-to-date (YTD), while COPP has returned 32.17%. That puts COPP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EMET or COPP?
Year-to-date, the EMET ETF saw +$752K in flows, compared to +$158M for COPP.
Which ETF is more volatile: EMET or COPP?
Over the past year, EMET had a volatility of 38.65%, while COPP experienced 42.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: EMET or COPP?
As of September 10, 2026, EMET holds $37.02 M in assets under management (AUM), while COPP manages $307.92 M.
What sectors do the EMET and COPP ETFs invest in?
EMET leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, COPP focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EMET ETF and COPP ETF?
EMET top holdings include Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Anglo American Plc and Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.. COPP holds in its top three: Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., Teck Resources Limited and Antofagasta Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: EMET or COPP?
EMET holds 57 securities with 65.83% of its assets in the top 15. COPP has 245 securities and a top 15 weight of 86.4%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EMET & COPP
ETF Comparison: Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Versus Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP)
February 6, 2026
COPP
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
COPP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
COPP
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Copper ETFs
May 28, 2024
COPP
Advertisement
Advertisement
