Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EATZvsRSPDETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Discretionary. EATZ's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples. In contrast, RSPD's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary EATZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.97%, versus 0.4% for RSPD. EATZ is up 2.85% year-to-date (YTD) with -$411K in YTD flows. RSPD performs worse with -4.68% YTD performance, and +$52M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EATZ and RSPD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EATZ vs RSPD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EATZ RSPD | -2.90%-7.79% | +0.86%-6.01% | +2.85%-4.68% | -0.11%+9.59% | +42.19%+37.91% | n/a+21.33% |
| Flows | EATZ RSPD | -+$64M | -$137K+$58M | -$411K+$52M | -$650K-$36M | -$729K-$388M | --$476M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EATZ RSPD | +16.97%+16.70% | +21.77%+22.65% | +19.42%+18.82% | n/a+21.92% |
| Max drawdown | EATZ RSPD | -5.94%-9.42% | -23.37%-14.36% | -23.37%-21.07% | n/a-34.36% |
| Max drawdown duration | EATZ RSPD | 55d58d | 248d46d | 248d213d | n/a1044d |
EATZ | RSPD | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:59 PM | $26.11 | $54.15 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.71 | $54.34 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EATZ | RSPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EATZ | RSPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.11 | $54.15 |
| 1D performance | -2.25% | -0.35% |
| AuM | $2.54 M | $264.09 M |
| E/R | 2.97% | 0.4% |
EATZ | RSPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary Index |
| N° of holdings | 17 | 48 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 20, 2021 | November 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EATZ and RSPD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EATZ is up 2.85% year-to-date (YTD), while RSPD has lost -4.68%. That puts EATZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EATZ or RSPD?
Year-to-date, the EATZ ETF saw -$411K in flows, compared to +$52M for RSPD.
Which ETF is more volatile: EATZ or RSPD?
Over the past year, EATZ had a volatility of 21.77%, while RSPD experienced 22.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: EATZ or RSPD?
As of March 11, 2026, EATZ holds $2.54 M in assets under management (AUM), while RSPD manages $264.09 M.
What sectors do the EATZ and RSPD ETFs invest in?
EATZ leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, RSPD focuses on Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EATZ ETF and RSPD ETF?
EATZ top holdings include BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, CASEYS GENERAL STORES and DUTCH BROS. RSPD holds in its top three: CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, STARBUCKS-T and EBAY.
Which ETF is more diversified: EATZ or RSPD?
EATZ holds 17 securities with 71.05% of its assets in the top 15. RSPD has 48 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.7%.
Ask the Manager: Why the Restaurant Industry Deserves a Look
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Equal-Weight ETFs
Analyzing the Potential ETF Winners & Losers from The Weight-Loss Drug Craze
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
