Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EATZvsPEZETF Comparison
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Discretionary. EATZ's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples. In contrast, PEZ's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary and Health Care.Communication Services, EATZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.97%, versus 0.78% for PEZ. EATZ is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD) with -$411K in YTD flows. PEZ performs worse with -4.74% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EATZ and PEZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EATZ vs PEZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EATZ PEZ | -4.64%-6.53% | +2.78%-5.54% | +3.42%-4.74% | -0.11%+17.22% | +39.11%+49.19% | n/a+13.30% |
| Flows | EATZ PEZ | -- | -$137K-$1M | -$411K-$2M | -$650K-$40M | -$729K-$11M | --$58M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EATZ PEZ | +17.38%+20.28% | +21.82%+24.26% | +19.46%+22.89% | n/a+24.95% |
| Max drawdown | EATZ PEZ | -5.73%-10.17% | -23.37%-15.68% | -23.37%-31.64% | n/a-41.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | EATZ PEZ | 53d56d | 246d45d | 246d470d | n/a1008d |
EATZ | PEZ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.71 | $98.43 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $26.78 | $99.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EATZ | PEZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EATZ | PEZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.71 | $98.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | -0.60% |
| AuM | $2.56 M | $23.77 M |
| E/R | 2.97% | 0.78% |
EATZ | PEZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Consumer Cyclicals Index |
| N° of holdings | 17 | 40 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 20, 2021 | October 12, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EATZ and PEZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, EATZ is up 3.42% year-to-date (YTD), while PEZ has lost -4.74%. That puts EATZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EATZ or PEZ?
Year-to-date, the EATZ ETF saw -$411K in flows, compared to -$2M for PEZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: EATZ or PEZ?
Over the past year, EATZ had a volatility of 21.82%, while PEZ experienced 24.26%.
Which ETF is bigger: EATZ or PEZ?
As of March 9, 2026, EATZ holds $2.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while PEZ manages $23.77 M.
What sectors do the EATZ and PEZ ETFs invest in?
EATZ leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, PEZ focuses on Consumer Discretionary and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the EATZ ETF and PEZ ETF?
EATZ top holdings include BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, CASEYS GENERAL STORES and DUTCH BROS. PEZ holds in its top three: ECHOSTAR, CARVANA CO and TAPESTRY INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: EATZ or PEZ?
EATZ holds 17 securities with 71.05% of its assets in the top 15. PEZ has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 54.29%.
Ask the Manager: Why the Restaurant Industry Deserves a Look
Analyzing the Potential ETF Winners & Losers from The Weight-Loss Drug Craze
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
