EAPRvsQYLDETF Comparison
ETF 1
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.88%
VS
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. EAPR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. EAPR is up 9.96% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 13.56% YTD performance, and -$166M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EAPR and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EAPR vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EAPR QYLD | -1.98%+1.24% | +2.07%+4.86% | +9.96%+13.56% | +12.10%+20.25% | +35.81%+52.89% | +31.41%+49.30% |
| Flows | EAPR QYLD | -$5M+$42M | -$10M+$58M | +$9M-$166M | +$7M-$263M | +$11M+$85M | +$39M+$4.84B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EAPR QYLD | +11.49%+9.78% | +10.75%+11.16% | +10.90%+13.51% | +11.41%+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | EAPR QYLD | -4.56%-3.58% | -5.30%-5.84% | -11.17%-19.06% | -15.20%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | EAPR QYLD | 24d10d | 51d39d | 84d239d | 602d771d |
Trading data
EAPR | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.78 | $18.32 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $33.17 | $18.74 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EAPR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexEAPR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EAPR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.78 | $18.32 |
| 1D performance | -1.16% | -2.24% |
| AuM | $94.78 M | $8.38 B |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.6% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EAPR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
EAPR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
EAPR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
EAPR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about EAPR and QYLD
How have the EAPR and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, EAPR is up 9.96% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 13.56%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EAPR or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the EAPR ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to -$166M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: EAPR or QYLD?
Over the past year, EAPR had a volatility of 10.75%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: EAPR or QYLD?
As of October 16, 2026, EAPR holds $94.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.38 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about EAPR & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
