DMARvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. DMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. DMAR is up 10% year-to-date (YTD) with +$44M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 14.32% YTD performance, and -$150M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DMAR and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DMAR vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DMAR QYLD | +0.85%-0.15% | +1.98%+6.67% | +10.00%+14.32% | +12.65%+19.41% | +40.62%+57.06% | +45.36%+49.90% |
| Flows | DMAR QYLD | -$3M+$26M | +$3M+$68M | +$44M-$150M | +$62M-$239M | +$150M+$111M | +$277M+$4.85B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DMAR QYLD | +2.79%+9.60% | +3.69%+11.16% | +6.98%+13.51% | +7.33%+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | DMAR QYLD | -0.55%-3.58% | -1.72%-5.84% | -9.23%-19.06% | -9.73%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | DMAR QYLD | 9d10d | 7d39d | 124d239d | 475d771d |
Trading data
DMAR | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.88 | $18.29 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $45.77 | $18.32 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DMAR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexDMAR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DMAR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.88 | $18.29 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | -0.16% |
| AuM | $464.90 M | $8.37 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
DMAR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE Nasdaq 100 BuyWrite V2 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 22, 2020 | December 11, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
DMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
DMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
DMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about DMAR and QYLD
How have the DMAR and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, DMAR is up 10% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 14.32%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DMAR or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the DMAR ETF saw +$44M in flows, compared to -$150M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: DMAR or QYLD?
Over the past year, DMAR had a volatility of 3.69%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: DMAR or QYLD?
As of October 16, 2026, DMAR holds $464.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.37 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about DMAR & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
